Skip to main content

With 40% non-citizen population, we still don’t know the outside world.

First published http://pijitailai.blogspot.sg/2014/10/with-40-non-citizen-population-we-still.html

We have a very high non-citizen population, maybe the highest in the world. And yet, we only know the world inside Singapore and not outside Singapore.

4 in 10 persons in the streets of Singapore are not citizens. We see foreigners, we encounter them, we meet them every few seconds and yet we don’t know them.  Foreigners work beside us; live next doors; go to the same wet markets, super markets, hawkers’ centers, take the same bus or train; and even attend the same schools, concerts, libraries, and museums.      

Why do we know nothing about the outside world? A skewed non-citizen population may explain this strange outcome. But this non-citizen population is big.  We are talking about millions of people. This big non-citizen population is big enough to have foreigners coming from all major countries, from all continents, and from different language and religion backgrounds.

These are rich resources to know about the outside world - a world outside Singapore. A world that PM Lee wanted Singaporeans to know.  

Speaking at an event to celebrate the 60th anniversary of National University of Singapore Society (NUSS), he wanted Singaporeans to pay attention to the outside world through traditional media.   

”I fear that Singaporeans are not paying enough attention to what’s happening outside of Singapore, as more people are getting their news not from reading newspapers or watching the television news…but from one another or through the social media.” #1

Interaction with foreigners in Singapore is one channel. Getting information from social media is another channel on top of the mainstream media.  Visiting and studying abroad can also broaden our understanding outside Singapore. Our schools are aggressively promoting overseas enrichment programs and joint education programs.  Are these still not enough?

The foreign students population in our universities is more than 20%. We even have Yale-NUS college and MIT-led Singapore University of Technology and Design.  While all these still cannot  match PM Lee’s expectation.

Lee believes that it is important to have a more global view because, it “sets own issues in perspective”.#1

What types of global views do we want Singaporeans to know, to learn and to understand? Arab Spring, Occupy Central, Orange Revolution; or World Economic Forum, G20 Meeting, APEC Meeting; or Social Good Summit, Human Rights Conference.  

PM Lee gives his ‘political right’ guideline - get your news from official  newspapers and television#1.  It was not surprised that he considered the documentary film “To Singapore, With Love” was not objectively enough.  He is trying to convince Singaporeans to read the objective news from the mainstream media.  And through these ‘political right’ channels, Singaporeans will get the objective and balanced global news and developments outside Singapore.   

With this ‘political right’ suggestion, he can only comment the Occupy Central as ‘a very careful watching’ from Beijing.
I’m quite sure there’s a large team on the Chinese side in Beijing watching this very carefully … very, very carefully.” #2

It is not sure whether there is also a large team in Singapore watching very carefully the movements of Singaporeans.  What do they read? What are their interest? What do they say in social media? And of course, what global news do they read?  

Accordingly to PM Lee, Singaporeans are not reading enough global news and fail to pay enough attention to the development outside Singapore.  If this is true, can it be related to the past 50 years of the ‘political right’ education? We don’t even know our history objectively.  We don’t even bother to take advantage of the foreigners living in Singapore to broaden our knowledge in global news.    

Only when we have a good understanding of Singapore history as well as the objective global news, we then can move forward as an individual and as a team. Carefully watching the ‘political right’ is not a solution for Singapore.

However, an objective global news and a clear picture of past history will speed up the change in Singapore.  This is why we are also very sure that the PAP government also has a large team overseeing the reading habits of Singaporeans like the large team in Beijing team watching over Occupy Central.

#1
https://sg.news.yahoo.com/singaporeans-need-to-also-look-at-what-s-happening-outside-of-singapore--pm-lee-152258114.html

#2
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/pm-lee-comments-on-occupy/1397064.html
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...
275 comments
Read more

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...
65 comments
Read more

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...
50 comments
Read more