Skip to main content

阿斗的民主逻辑:官委高于民权民选。


李显龙的外号叫阿斗,在网上几乎人人都知道。现在看到他的民主逻辑:官委议员在国会的表现比民选的议员还要胜任,民选的议员根本不合格。他的脑袋真的进水了,已经几乎到了‘乐不思蜀’的地步。因为,他的快乐是建立在过去,而不是未来。他根本不了解新加坡的民主运动过程,乐的是一党专政,一手遮天的过去。难怪,黄永宏团队昨天高举一手遮天的造势,就是要表达这点,过去的快感。

李显龙当然希望每个官委议员,都会附和他的看法,说公积金不是个人的,因此,不可以随意的动用。也不过问公积金,储备,海外投资等问题。

官委议员的设立,根本就是开了民主的倒车,他还沾沾自喜,拿来当成是一个成就。

*为什么会有官委议员的出现?

*为什么会有集选区的出现?

*为什么会有非选区议员的出现?

*为什么选区划分成为一个常态?

这些都是非民主化的表现,而对于一个离开人民越来越远的人民行动党来说,李显龙是很难看到民间的要求,民主的发展,民权的重要。行动党已经没有人民两个字了,它的行动党就是一手遮天,喜欢做什么,就做什么,当然,钱和经济是它行动的动力,没有高薪的动力,行动党根本成不了军。

当工人党提出‘掌握民权,把握未来’的竞选口号的时候,他当然会很在意,这表示行动党一手遮天的政治局面,已经成为过去。行动党从来就没有让新加坡人民,当家做主,我们的人权记录和媒体排名,在世界上和第三世界比美,行动党当然希望继续下去,让它能够一党专政下去。可惜,这种情形,已经不存在了,后李光耀时代,行动党需要把民权交出来,不可以再继续欺骗人民了。



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...