Skip to main content

Empower Your Future for a Balanced Parliament


No Demonstration, No Protest, Your Votes Can Empower Your Future and Make a Peaceful Change!





An imbalanced parliament will create uncertainty and of course, affecting our future. General election is a decision day, a judgement day for our future. We want a peaceful change and we can do it using our votes, not through violent protest or demonstration.


Singaporeans are pragmatic and voting is secret. It is the most effective way to make the peaceful change with empowerment ourselves.


We play it according to the PAP game rules and guidelines. This is the beauty of Singapore.  Singaporeans prefer a stable transfer and change over.  And we do it according to the PAP way: through GRCs and SMCs with boundary changes designed by the ruling party.  Hence, it is safe and perfect.


We have given up so much in the past 50 years. All rules are set by the PAP and furthermore, all mainstream media are under the control of the PAP.
Despite these obstacles, oppositions are fighters and fight to win.


Singaporeans have few options and the only option we have is our votes. Vote wisely. The PAP is only afraid of Singaporeans on polling day. Since voters are king makers, we want to vote for the party serving the best of our interest.    
Continuing voting for the PAP will continue to create an imbalanced parliament.  That is bad for future Singapore, especially when you consider there are so many PAP candidates get elected through the backdoor under the GRC system. Can we trust the system in producing credible MPs?
No one can buy our votes. We decide our future, we empower our future with the opposition, for the opposition and for Singapore. PM Lee said selected the party best represents your interest. So, I say no to the People’s Action Party as the PAP cannot protect my future. PM said vote for the person who can put me in the right path, I say thank you very much we are at different path.
Vote for Change! Vote Workers’ Party!


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...
275 comments
Read more

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...
65 comments
Read more

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...
50 comments
Read more