Skip to main content

Empower Your Future for a Balanced Parliament


No Demonstration, No Protest, Your Votes Can Empower Your Future and Make a Peaceful Change!







An imbalanced parliament will create uncertainty and of course, affecting our future. General election is a decision day, a judgement day for our future. We want a peaceful change and we can do it using our votes, not through violent protest or demonstration.


Singaporeans are pragmatic and voting is secret. It is the most effective way to make the peaceful change with empowerment ourselves.


We play it according to the PAP game rules and guidelines. This is the beauty of Singapore.  Singaporeans prefer a stable transfer and change over.  And we do it according to the PAP way: through GRCs and SMCs with boundary changes designed by the ruling party.  Hence, it is safe and perfect.


We have given up so much in the past 50 years. All rules are set by the PAP and furthermore, all mainstream media are under the control of the PAP.


Despite these obstacles, oppositions are fighters and fight to win.


Singaporeans have few options and the only option we have is our votes. Vote wisely. The PAP is only afraid of Singaporeans on polling day. Since voters are king makers, we want to vote for the party serving the best of our interest.    


Continuing voting for the PAP will continue to create an imbalanced parliament.  That is bad for future Singapore, especially when you consider there are so many PAP candidates get elected through the backdoor under the GRC system. Can we trust the system in producing credible MPs?


No one can buy our votes. We decide our future, we empower our future with the opposition, for the opposition and for Singapore. PM Lee said selected the party best represents your interest. So, I say no to the People’s Action Party as the PAP cannot protect my future. PM said vote for the person who can put me in the right path, I say thank you very much we are at different path.


Vote for Change! Vote Workers’ Party!




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting

因为有比较, 才知道做得不够, 才明白什么叫做易通。

  因为有比较, 才知道做得不够, 才明白什么叫做易通。 如果只有一套解决方法,很难看出好坏,方便还是不方便,易通还是不容易通。用新方法代替旧的系统,人们当然会做比较,尤其是科技产品,使用的人很多,一用就马上看到结果。 这是一个竞争的世界,即使一党独大,也要考虑到便民。当人民觉得不方便,不好用,不易通,就会反映,发声,不满。为什么没有预先想到,最可怕的是测试时,已经接到反应,还是不加改善。或许,行动党还抱着“令伯”最大,用者自行解决问题。 易通公交收费系统的整合,似乎缺少一种人文,沟通,反而更加多表现出政府的独断独行。尤其重要的是,如果只有一套系统,我们是看不出问题,做不出好坏的评价。 这其实证明国会里不可以只有一把声音,没有比较,没有进步。

After 60 years, after 3 failed political imaginations, the PAP is deteriorating...