Skip to main content

如果黄永宏连喊声都经受不起,又何必来参选。

2015 PAP Strategy 战略 20 --  欺人太甚

莱佛士书院提名中心的喊声!

黄永宏连目标都搞不清楚,向行动党发出呼呼声(jeer)的大部分是工人党支持者,而不是他的在碧山-大巴窑的对手,人民党的支持者。不论如何,他把所有反对党支持者都归成一类。


但是,他最失败,或者他认为最自豪的应该是批评反对党支持者,形容他们似乎是没有受过教育的一群人。但是,行动党会把他们的孩子教育好(意思是说不像他们的老子那么无理),就像行动党花几十年把碧山(莱佛士书院)从一片荒地,建成今天的美好家园。同时,行动党也会像照顾人民那样,照顾反对党的孩子。


新加坡现在的事实是,人民没有觉得行动党能够在花园上,再建一个花园。反而,人民认为行动党是一代不如一代,不要说家园,在教育上,孩子们也越来越不喜欢行动党。连小朋友的画作,也把行动党当成一个目标,看来行动党教育下的孩子,很可能比他们的父母更加的不满行动党。黄永宏的家园和教育计划,时间越长,就对行动党越不利。


下面是一副新加坡小朋友的画作:

黄永宏一定认为,这样的孩子一定有问题

黄永宏看了,是不是会说有其父必有其子。黄永宏曾经担任过教育部长,他真的没有替行动党做到教好小朋友的责任。因为,小朋友要到工人党,反对党的群众大会听一听,看一看,这么一来,真的会辜负了黄永宏的一番心意。行动党的教育政策,也可能教出更加多和行动党思想不一致的学生。这从2015大选,年轻反对党候选人的素质提高,可以看出来。这是‘近’的现象,‘远’的现象,对行动党更加不利。


行动党的失败,不得人心,或者说行动党的自负,自认为高人一等,在黄永宏身上就完全的显现出来。在下面的录像中,你可以很清楚的看到,他的高傲,高高在上的样子。




一个高高在上的候选人,站在台上,向反对党支持者喊话,也只有行动党的候选人,具备有这样的霸气,和不顾选民有自我表达心仪政党的权利。这真的是做政府做太久,忘记一人一票,他的一张嘴,或者他那一组五人团队,能够和下面这么多反对党支持者在人数相比美吗?


黄永宏是行动党这次2015大选的主要负责人。他的压力当然很大。他如此激动的表情,也正代表了行动党这次的选情。你知道吗?他还在歌台上,和叶丽仪一起高唱‘月亮代表我的心’,这个心到底是什么颜色?只有他自己知道。

‘月亮代表我的心’是前总统王鼎昌喜欢的歌,黄永宏跟着唱这首歌,让人觉得很不是滋味。或许,他真的自我感觉良好,可以一下子霸气,一下子假情假意,温柔一下,对着喜欢的选民,就来‘月亮代表我的心’,不喜欢的选民就侮辱一下。

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...