Skip to main content

从后港出发:摆脱专制,还我民权。






工人党的娘家在后港单选区,从1991年开始,这里就是工人党的基地、大本营。后港人一直以不害怕行动党的强权而自豪。这股自豪,在2011年后,又进一步延伸到阿裕尼集选区和榜鹅东单选区。



这让行动党政府不是滋味。冷言冷语当然不少,例如:在国会外是老虎,在国会内却是老鼠。工人党对国会一点建设都没有,连官委议员都不如。这两年来,行动党害怕失掉更多议席,一直在打诚信牌。似乎行动党候选人的人格高高在上,而反对党候选人的诚信一定有问题。在心理学上,别人的错误就是自己的缺点,世界没有完人,行动党更加不是圣人。行动党说的越多,就反映和表示自己的问题更加大和多。只是时间未到,或许是在专制政治环境下,选民根本没有机会看到行动党诚信背后的真面目。

说到底,行动党就是害怕这股由后港发起的民权运动。选民们,2015大选是打倒专制,还我民权的时候了。有民权,就有诚信,工人党候选人如果真的没有诚信,我们当然要放弃工人党。同样的,行动党候选人,如果没有诚信,我们更加要放弃行动党。这就是政治诚信的标准。

李显龙今天早上,还是很不满意工人党(昨晚群众大会)的回答。他的用语,很明显的已经有点失去理智,他说:

“High standards are expected of political leaders, and not going to jail should not be the benchmark of doing a good job, said Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong on Thursday.” (ST,September 3)
【避免进牢房不是把事情做好的标准。对于政治领袖,(选民)期待的是高的标准和要求。】

他认为工人党的标准很低,选民不应该选择低标准的工人党候选人。因为在国会里,工人党议员做不了事,在国会外,管理市政也是低标准。他们只是做到不进牢房的标准。这是一个最基本的标准。选民应该选择行动党这样高标准的政党。你认为这像不像疯话?

政治领袖的‘天命’来自于对人民好不好,对国家管理的好不好。人民的生活过得好不好,有没有一年比一年进步。这是选民对行动党的期待和要求。李显龙应该问一问自己,担任总理10年多,他给人民带来什么?他本身有没有做到这个标准?就是因为他没有达标,选民才会要求民权,要求更加多的话语权。他的牢房论应该拿到精神病院去检查一下。因为新加坡人的压力,在行动党管理下,精神问题增加了,牢房问题也增加了。

李显龙把个人的独照,在新加坡各个角落高挂,似乎是精神问题,而不是牢房问题。他自认很受到欢迎和人民爱戴。这种自我感觉良好,自恋心态,让人感到这样的人是否适合担任总理一职。因为,只有选总统,才在全国各地高挂人头照。他把自己估计的太高,把对手看得太低。在政治,这是一个失策,自己失分,而让对手得分。这样的人担任行动党领袖,真令人替行动党担忧。


为了行动党的将来,行动党本身应该考虑把李显龙换掉。他把个人照,在全国各地高挂,尤其在农历七月,在夜深人静的时候,会令人胡思乱想,产生精神错乱。
所以说,精神病院论比牢房论更加适合李显龙。

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...