Skip to main content

长期一党专政,新加坡无法摆脱行动党的奴性。


几年前读过《王蒙的红楼梦》,其中有一句话,让我印象深刻:贾府奴才“不奴隶毋宁死”的心态。王蒙过后还特地出版了一本同名的《不奴隶,毋宁死?——王蒙谈红说事》。

red chamber book.jpg



好多年前,王蒙还做过中国文化部长,他对人性的观察,尤其是把奴性放在自由之上,做不了贾府的奴隶,生不如死,宁可死在贾府,也不愿意踏出贾府一步,真的是一针见血的观察。wang 王蒙:贾府奴才“不奴隶毋宁死”心态_新华每日电讯.png
#节录自《王蒙的红楼梦》

这种奴性心态,似乎也反映在2015年的大选。新加坡虽然是第一世界经济体,人均收入高居发达国家之上,但是,在人民行动党50年来的调教下,人民似乎更加乐于放弃自由,放弃民主,放弃制衡,而选择行动党的一党专政,更加多的迷恋经济成长的果实。


国人为先党的洪永元医生把这次大选,行动党高票中选的原因归于选民有感恩的心态。他把这种心态称为: transfer of gratitude. 选民感恩于李光耀对新加坡的贡献,因此,把这种感恩的心态转嫁给李显龙。


感恩和王蒙的奴性是有一些差别,但是,贾府的丫鬟不愿意离开贾府,和新加坡选民不愿意离开行动党(李家),似乎有着异曲同工之妙。正如,行动党在分析胜利的原因时,特别提出选民要求一个稳定的政治,当然也看到行动党过去的成绩。


我们回看《红楼梦》,贾府的过去当然是无限风光,名门望族,多少人想进入贾府都不容易。何况,那些进了贾府的人和丫鬟,他们宁可死在贾府也不愿出贾府一步。他们的吃喝穿住,每一样都比外面的世界好。这不是新加坡的写照吗? 行动党一直告诉选民,新加坡有多好,比其他国家好很多。选民最好选择行动党,继续在行动党的大家族管理下,享受第一流的生活,而不要操心民主,自由,制衡等。即使有这样的要求,也应该以行动党的标准来作为标准。以行动党的诚信为诚信的标准。


http://pijitailai.blogspot.sg/2015/09/lee-hsien-loong-hangs-his-posters.html



为了胜选,行动党的张有福和张志贤,还创造新的会记标准。
总审计署花了10个审计工人党市镇会的账目,也没有·出来说明。会计审计师学会,也没有出来澄清,指正。而任由行动党的标准横行。行动党影响整个社会的奴性,可想而知。


就像贾府的丫鬟和佣人,他们只是看到贾府内部的事情,而不知道外面的世界。他们不知道自己处在险峰,贾府的树倒猢狲散是迟早的问题。贾府内部根本没有一个能够解救贾府命运的人。


行动党口口声声说,现在开始进入第四代领导层的工作。到底它是不是另一个贾府,目前言之过早。


但是,选民如果没有做两手准备,把鸡蛋都放在行动党的篮子里,是不是也像贾府的丫鬟那样,自行选择放弃自由,选择离开贾府的机会,到最后,也和贾府一样,充军的充军,被卖掉的卖掉,下放的下放,连妙玉这种洁身自爱的人,也难逃劫数。


过去50多年,行动党成功的把这种奴性灌输入选民的脑子里。在教育,在媒体,在行政,在司法,各方各面无孔不入,把这种依赖行动党的心态置入选民的心里。因此,在关键的时刻,感恩的心态就出现,选票当然就高了。洪永元医生认为,下一届大选,感恩心态就会消失。这是比较乐观的看法。


事实上,行动党不但在国民教育上做到感恩的心态,即使是新移民,也同样做到了,甚至有过之而无不及。外来移民不只是感恩行动党,他们也希望行动党继续执行类似贾府的政策,他们认为继续让贾府管理新加坡,他们才有出息。如果,没有行动党的政策,他们很可能就不选择来新加坡。因为,没有行动党,就没有人会继续执行这个优良的东方传统 - 贾府的奴性政治。

这就是新加坡的将来吗?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...