Skip to main content

Deficit = Surplus. PAP is a liar.





Is the PAP a credible party? Where is the public trust
when a deficit is equal to a surplus? 

The People’s Action Party has a strange logic and mathematics. When the is a deficit, they can say openly that it is a surplus.  They even get mainstream media to help them to promote the false information. And the media, on their responsible parts, fails to check the truth.
Image result for teo chee hean

 Where is the evidence, DPM Teo Chee Hean? 

Image result for charles chong
Where is the documentary proof, Charles Chong? 

And why there is no check of truth before publication?
This is the account of Punggol East single constituency before the PAP handed over it to the Workers’ Party. To the PAP, a deficit of more than $280,000 can be turned into a surplus of $280,000. Is this not magic?
I am very worry they are doing the sum mathematics and accounting to our reserves, CPF, GIC, Temasek, etc. Deficit in theses accounts can be reported as surplus and the media just publishes them without questioning. Where are the checks and balances? Voters should think careful is this the right way to empower your future?   


 The PAP with the strong state machinery knows everything about the state of Punggol East in 2013.  Why then they want to tell lies? The answer is very simple - to score political points by misleading voters.
If voters still believe what the PAP version of the AHPETC saga, then they are having the wrong trust to a liar. If someone can tell you a deficit is equal to a surplus, then he is telling lies. THINK. Does the PAP still as credible as what they have claimed. Do you still trust a party that says negative is equal to positive. No, certainly not.


We also cannot expect the media to check on the government. They just blindly report what is given to them without checking and verification.
In the past 50 years, this is the political culture of Singapore. It is time for a change. We must question and demand proof. Under LKY, what the PAP said was 100% right and what the opposition said was 100% wrong. How can this be. DPM Teo and Charles Chong are good examples that the PAP is wrong. They fail to prove there is a surplus.
They just said there is a surplus without giving a figure.  We now know that it is $280,000 in red as shown below by WP chief Low Thia Kiang.

 Image result for low on punggol east deficit

Who is telling lies? WP or PAP. 
We now wait for the PAP to explain to the voters in what way a deficit can become a surplus. Many loan borrowers and debt owners want to know how to play this magic.



As PM Lee suggested voters should be dispassionate and in good conscience. Now, we know the truth we should not give credit to the PAP and we should make up our minds to vote for WP, SDP, SingFirst, and other opposition parties.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...
275 comments
Read more

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...
65 comments
Read more

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...
50 comments
Read more