Skip to main content

Lee Hsien Loong hangs his posters everywhere but certainly his face will not appear in all ballot papers. Sadly, Lee Kuan Yew can no more right the wrong for Singapore.


Deficit = Surplus. A deputy prime minister cannot read financial statements, are you worry? Is this a new creative accounting? DPM Teo can go to Wall Street to explain to investors that in Singapore we allow a loss in income statement to be considered a profit.  
This is the picture of Singapore today. Without the guidance and supervision of Lee Kuan Yew, deficit can be surplus and nobody cares. Nobody dares to care and points out the mistakes.
Lee Hsien Loong is putting his posters all over Singapore. But he cannot protect all of you.  He also cannot appear in all ballot papers come September, 11.  He can only appear in Ang Mo Kio Group Representative Constituency where Ravi, Roy, Gilbert will also appear together with him.



A prime minister can put up his posters during election, but for sure he cannot represent all citizens in all constituencies. PM Lee is only one of the candidates in AMK GRC.
Will he will also follow the same standard as his deputy to turn deficit into surplus for all government financial transactions? Will he do the same for our reserves, CPF, GIC, Temasek etc.? And his another deputy, a financial minister, just pretends nothing has happened.
 
This new accounting standard not only gets Singaporeans worry. And local and foreign investors will get worry too. It is adjusting one side of the account and ignore the double entry system. Of course, if you have ill intention, you will like this wonderful accounting standard.
The passing of Lee Kuan Yew was just 6 months ago. Now with the new ‘deficit = surplus’ new accounting standard in income statements, no one can help us to put it right. We hope LKY can return and right the wrong but it is impossible. 

  
Who can help us?
For Singapore to move forward, do you expect and trust that the PAP is able to check on themselves?

Empower yourself and protect your future by voting for Workers’ Party, Singapore Democratic Party, SingFirst and other opposition parties. Only opposition parties dare to point out the difference. 

Deficit is not Surplus. Only opposition parties can check and balance the government.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...
275 comments
Read more

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...
65 comments
Read more

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...
50 comments
Read more