Skip to main content

对行动党宽宏大量 对反对党处处刁难


2015年大选,人民行动党春风得意,运气出奇的好,好到连行动党本身都不相信。当然,选民也不相信,自己手中的一票,竟然让行动党大胜特胜。

行动党的每一步,似乎都注定成功,从SG50开始,李光耀去世,建国一代优惠,医药保健,公积金部分提出,诚信问题, 到最后的可能失去执政地位,前总统候选人出现在反对党的造势,群众大会人数很多,都让选民认为,行动党会面对失去政权的危险。原本希望国会有少数反对党议员的选民,开始反思,万一搞不好,过去的稳定就会消失。当越来越多的选民有着这样的心理反应,同时,又抱着not in my backyard的心态,既然对反对党的支持这么好,就让别的选区投选反对党吧!



行动党背后的风水,真的是一个高人,9月1日提名日为定江山,9月11日为吉日,开票后,果然节节胜利。当然,李光耀还是一直在保护着行动党,即使到了阴间,他的光环,依然照耀着行动党,让行动党顺利的过关,过的轻松写意。当然,演戏也要演全套,行动党中选的候选人,也不忘连连说humble,自我谦虚一番。

这是asiaone.com 的一个标题:

PAP's huge win due to Lee Kuan Yew, SG50: Reports


从另一个角度看来,新加坡选民似乎太容易骗了。什么民权,什么未来,什么民主,什么公正,这些行动党都能够处理好,只要相信行动党,一切都行。这和中国人对新加坡人的观感十分吻合:

stupid singaporeans.png



作为执政党,一党专政50多年,行动党怎么会不明白这个道理。只是这回的骗术(再加上恐吓)特别有运气,把选民都骗得团团转,一点都没有觉察出来。就如,上文说的:随便编个理由,就能让他们心服口服。

新加坡选民是否真的被骗得心服口服?那只有等2020大选才能知道答案。PAP % vote.png
上图是1959年以来,行动党的得票率,这是一党专政的象征。未来几届大选,行动党的得票率也将在60%-70%之间来回。这样的趋势说明,新加坡出现两党制的机会几乎等于零。选民可能对一些课题不满,行动党得票率就下降到65%甚至60%。

当然两党制或许有机会发生,那就是行动党第四代领导层,真的很不行,什么都无法满足选民的要求,改变是唯一的办法。另外,行动党自己闹翻了,分裂了。还有,接管行动党是一门生意,别有企图的外人,有可能插手行动党管理层。或者,另立一个财雄势大的政党与行动党抗争。不要忘记,再过几年,外来人口,将占人口总数的一半。

行动党一党专政,新加坡表面的稳定,是否能够继续下去,见仁见智。这种稳定,是否真的能够团结人民,唤起爱国心,这又要回到运气问题了。行动党真的有这么多好运气吗?新加坡选民把运气建立在行动党身上,是否是一个大赌局,雷曼兄弟会倒台,谁能确保行动党万无一失呢?




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...