Skip to main content

行动党闪电人数多多,但却没有怒吼声


行动党闪电人数多多,但却没有怒吼声


今早坐巴士前往德义中学提名中心,在车上靠近安全门的地方,有着这么一个告示:


紧急时,请用铁锤敲破玻璃门。
Use Hammer To Break Window Glass.

新加坡选民,现在就是紧急时刻,大家努力把行动党脆弱的玻璃门撬开, 打破。在有机会投票的82个选区,用铁锤,火箭,四轮驱动,改革,等等击破行动党虚假的玻璃门。

勇敢的反对党候选人,已经站出来让选民有一个选择。他们面对的是公器私用强大的的行动党,一个一党独大了50多年的执政党。因此,弱小的反对党只是希望能够突破一个集选区,这就是反对党的希望,也是人民的希望。行动党到底有多强大,一路做着巴士回家,满街上已经插上行动党的的党旗。不到一个小时,它已经把党旗插满新加坡。够威风了吧!不只是这样,主流媒体将会大力帮助行动党打选战,抹黑行动也已经开始了。我们真的感受到行动党的影响,党旗,宣传告示,满满的的满街张贴。行动党的宣传车队布满整个新加坡,那一道道玻璃门把我们锁得紧紧的。

这种闪电满新加坡闪着,白天晚上闪个不停,真是烦死人了。幸运的很,有闪电没有打雷声是不成气候的。就在德义中学现场,在操场上,只见布满了闪电的旗海,在飘着,连候选人的选区合照牌子也准备好了。但是,却是静静的,人多无声,人数再多,没有人高呼,是不成气候的。这些坐着准备好的巴士来,好多是上了年纪,是来看看玩玩,当然,要他们发出声音,高喊,是不可能的,跟不用说,怒吼了。

反观反对党的支持者,人数就少很多了。穿的服装有的浅蓝,有些黄的,有些绿的,有些白的,各种各样什么都有。但是,当提名结束,官员公布竞选名单和让侯选人发言时,反对党的支持者就发出怒吼,打断行动党候选人发言,用怒吼声掩盖会场。行动党候选人个个不看也不敢看反对党的支持者,不知道是心知理亏,还是害怕人民的心声和怒吼声。

闪电无声,人民怒吼听到了吗?
一只手是打不出声响的,也不可能打出声音的,需要两只手才行。行动党独臂刀王,称霸武林50多年,尽然独孤无敌了这麽久。现在是改变的时候了。即使独臂刀王还可称霸武林多一些时候,但是一统天下的时代,就将结束。国会里需要另一把声音,另一只手,才能把新加坡带上新的高峰- 第一世界国会。

195963日,国父李光耀在新加坡自治时讲过以下这番话:

Source: Lee Kuan Yew at 80
一个民族的历史,每隔一段长时期会出现一次重大的转折。今晚就是我们生命中这么一个至关重要的时刻。

Once in a long while in the history of a people there comes a moment of great change. Tonight is such a moment in our lives.


是的,今年是2011年,已经过了50年又两年,国父的话我们要记得。国父的教导我们要听。

我们已经等50年又两年, 是时候出现一次重大的转折了吧。

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...