Skip to main content

风雨同舟,共创未来, 你准备好了吗?


风雨同舟,共创未来, 你准备好了吗?

风雨同舟,共创未来, 为了行动党还是新加坡? 

行动党的竞选标语终于出炉了。风雨同舟,共创未来Securing our future together)。行动党要和你共进退,同舟共济,一起面对未来,创造未来。

50年来,我们不是一直和行动党一起风雨同舟,共创未来吗?什么时候,新加坡人民不是和行动党一起度过艰难的经济和金融风暴。但是,每次风暴过后,人们的生活素质,生活条件,政治自由,开放是否变得更好?富者越富,贫者越贫。的确,有人更好,但是,有更多的人,却必须面对生活成本的压力。

因此,什么是风雨同舟?行动党希望新加坡人做出牺牲,为稳定物价做出牺牲,对外劳和交通拥挤做出忍耐,对新闻管制,对不公平选举制度,做出容忍。他们说,小不忍,则乱了他们大计划。

大选要来了,物价上涨的压力却不断来临。因此,部长议员到处走动,劝小贩们半年内不起价,不要加重市民的生活费。这些人,日领千,万元一天,却叫低薪人士忍耐,不要起价,自己却领取高达8个月的花红。为表同情,行动党就让新加坡人分享到几百元的红包。他们没有想办法增加低薪人士的收入,还要你不要加价来达到他们本身的政治目的。小贩的牺牲真伟大,他们为新加坡人民做出牺牲,但是,政治成果却让行动党独享。每每想到这里,我们应该投小贩一票,选几个小贩代表进入国会,为小市民发声。行动党部长议员,呼吁小贩们风雨同舟,自己荷包肥肥,人家荷包扁扁,心里不会流下一点眼泪吗?

不尽如此,新加坡工友,年老工友,还要忍耐与外劳同酬。因为,我们要维持竞争力,成本不可以太高,新加坡人不管你家里的压力有大,即使收入不负支出,也要忍耐,为国做出牺牲。还有,我国人才也要和外来人才竞争,行动党会继续引进来外国人才,你们要做好牺牲的准备。公共交通方面,也要做好准备面对拥挤,人潮的压力。

在精神上,新加坡人要忍耐新闻管制,忍耐集选区的不公平。一家电视媒体,一家报业集团,你的心声是被选择性的接受,喜欢就帮你报道,不喜欢就放一边。集选区是不会被废除的,总理不是说的很清楚吗?这是为了确保少数种族有代表在国会。

共创未来 又是怎么回事呢?我们只能有一对A队。不要制衡,一党独大继续独大下去。屋价继续上涨,这是为了你的将来保值。消费税也可能上涨,因为财政如果不平衡,政府没钱,人民还是要交多一点税。贫富距离会继续加大,而国库也会增加,因为,要为未来更大的挑战而准备。

总理一再强调,我们的政治人才,只能组织一对A队。不能分散人才,外国投资者会失去信心的。如果行动党受到制衡,行动党会分心,不能把国家治理好。 因此,最好的未来,是一个一党独大的行动党。在国会里,有18位没有投票权的非选区和官委议员。

组屋价格会继续上涨,因为,低的新组屋售价,跟中等收入人士挂沟,是行不通的,这会影响整体屋价,会影响屋子的保值。当然,屋价不涨,政府的收入如何增加?为了钱,屋价涨的多,政府最开心,部长议员的花红也能多收。

贫富距离会继续加大,行动党叫你去学习,学习后,不一定有工作给你。我们没有免费午餐,公积金也救不了你,看得到,拿不到。但是,奇怪的是,国库却会增加,因为,税收增加了,卖组屋也赚了钱,COE,还有其他收费也会增加。 但是,如何管理国库,却是看不到,拿不到,更不知道是怎么回事,因为,只有一,两个人知道,连总统都不知道。我们为行动党而共创未来,为未来而面对更大的挑战,这个准备是为了谁,就好像有人在问,我们为谁而战?

风雨同舟,共创未来, 是为了新加坡还是行动党的集体思维,小集团思维?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...