Skip to main content

平时是老板头家,大选变成人民公仆


平时是老板头家,大选变成人民公仆


李显龙总理在人民行动党青年团举行成立25周年庆祝大会时,要求党的候选人要做人民公仆,不要做人民的主人。这样,才能争取选民的支持。新加坡选民不知是幸运不是不幸运,每五年才知道自己才是老板头家,自己才是主人。

事实上,不久前,行动党还是头家前,老板后的。就在36日早报的一则标题是拉丁马士邻里换头家,内容说由于新的选区划分,拉丁马士将成为单选区,因此,新的负责议员将是陈振泉。早报还引顾蔡矶的话,你好。这一区已经不是丹戎巴葛了,换成拉丁马士。这位陈振泉是这里的新头家(负责人),大选的时候要请你照顾一下,多多支持。

行动党犹如一条变色龙,每五年大选来了,就摇身一变成为人民公仆。大选过后,又变回原形成了新加坡人的老板头家。因为,每次大选过后,就会有些措施要改变,税务也要改变,收费也要更新。生活费不但没有减轻,反而会增加。消费税,教育费,水电费,大选后就会调整。

还有一些政策,大选前大开杀戒,采取严格的措施,如,外劳政策,外国人才政策,组屋政策,车辆政策,等到大选过后,又打回原形,露出变色龙的本色。50多年了,我们已经和这条变色龙共舞了这么长的一段时间了。难道还不厌倦,难道还不把变色龙毒打一番,逼它现出真身,让它真正的为民服务。

每次大选过后,行动党政府机会借国际形势的严峻,要求国人做出调整,做出牺牲,要求人民同舟共济,共创未来。接着,就是各种各样的调整,加价。

但是,当人民要求知道国库储备情形,淡马锡的投资情形,政府投资公司的情形,公积金的情形,行动党就会以各种借口,不是说要50年才能做出账来,就是投资情形需要保密,不能公开,不然就说,我们的投资是看长期的,短期的波动不会影响我们的长远利益。不知在那里听过一位经济学家说过,在长期,我们大家都死光光。行动党大概就是希望你死光光,这样一来,就不会问长问短。

50多年来,国会里没有制衡力量。也没有人敢问,问了也随便给个答案,不了了之,反正,其他行动党议员是不会问的。偶尔,有人在国会外问了几下,这可不得了,有些作古了,也得不到答案,活着的,身败名裂,可能还要吃黑豆饭。

接下来的两个星期多一点,新加坡选民可够威风了,是主人了。一旦大选过了,主人就变成行动党,不管你喜欢不喜欢,这个现实50年来都不变,难道今年的风水不一样吗?

新加坡选民如果要改变命运的话,就要做出牺牲,让反对党在自己选区中选,不要寄望反对党议员在其他人的选区出现。不然,行动党的变色龙主人,头家,老板统统出现,压到你出不了声。昨天,有一个政治论坛,两位专家说,行动党这回大选,整体得票会下降几个百分点,这几个百分点,不会让反对党胜出的,还很可能出现86:1的局面。

早报报道:新加坡管理大学法律系助理教授陈庆文和独立政治学者德里克博士, 对于这次大选可能出现的局面,作出相当保守的预测,认为有可能出现的两种情况,一是只有工人党继续保住后港区的议席;另一是反对党成功攻破一个集选区,并拿下几个单议席选区,但这是属于最乐观的预测。陈庆文倾向工人党只能保住后港区,行动党则拿下其余86个议席。但是,他预测行动党整体得票率会被拉低,只能取得60%至63%得票率,比上届大选的66.6%得票率低。

看了上面的分析,新加坡选民可要好好的想一想,区区只是把行动党得票拉低,是于事无补的,到头来,还是要做回仆人,任由行动党我行我素。

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...