Skip to main content

Will Cheng Bock withdraw from the race for the good of Tony?



Will Cheng Bock withdraw from the race for the good of Tony?


Do you really believe there will be a 4-corner contest?  And no one will withdraw from the race at the last minute?   Let wait and see how the drama will be ended.  May be there are more surprises to come.

It is very difficult to define an election, especially for the top post of a country to be non-political. Even a debate on academic topics, an argument on philosophical ideas, or the competition of the post of CEO, all involve politics and strategies.

Example of election strategies

If you look at our neighbour, Malaysia, there are always multi-corners contests in their elections. Some times, there are even up to 5 or 6 contestants.
And just before polling day, you will see 1, 2 or 3 even 4 contestants announce their withdrawal from the race.

Why do they do that?  This is ensure the preferred choice of ruling party (or even the oppositions) having a better chance to win the race.  Deposits and other expenses are not important issues.  But winning the election needs skilled strategies. Some sacrifices, either personal image or money, are less important and end result of a win is crucial.

Another example is Aljunied GRC.

Indications of below par performance  

Cheng Bock’s performance at the ST Roundtable is quite disappointed, especially the first question on the President’s salary. He seems to suggest there are ‘quite” a lot of works for the Elected President as suggested by President Nathan.

Even his nomination day speech is not impressive. He wants to promote multi-racialism and be the unifying figure to achieve this goal.   Doesn’t he forget in the Singapore National Pledge, we clearly pledge ourselves as one united people, regardless of race, language or religion?

Anyway, when Cheng Bock first announced his interest to run for the President, his main purpose is to prevent a walkover. He has no intention to win the race.  A little bit like Chua Kim Yew when he stood in the EP contest. Later on, he moved his position to unifying people. But his determination of a win is not as strong as Tony or Jee Say.

Cheng Bock has in fact completed his mission as on August 27, there is a contest on the Elected President in Singapore. We should thank him for a mission completed.

His below bar performance may be an intention to let Tony to score points. If the PAP supporters are disappointed with him, most of the disappointed votes will go to Tony rather than Kin Lian or Jee Say.  Even half of it goes to Tony will be enough for a win.

Survey and feedback

Besides openly supporting Tony, the PAP machinery is not idling.  They are monitoring the feedback, the reaction and conducting survey likes the one, days before GE2011 by an Australian company. 

Due the size of the whole population and the involvement of all voters, the samples collected and the margin of errors in this survey can be further improved. The Australian company can even better their job this time as the survey result will be more accurate than the GE2011 one statistically saying.    

Cheng Bock is making his move intentionally or unintentionally that we don’t know. But this will help the PAP to observe the feedback and reactions from the voters.  Everyday, the PAP will need to make a strategic move, that include the last minute withdrawal of Cheng Bock. Cheng Bock’s votes although is small but a win of one vote is a win.

Next to Tony, Cheng Bock is the one closely associated to the PAP.  We can not rule out the emotion factor.  If the PAP elders request his sacrifice and he believes his sacrifice is good for Singapore, good for unifying Singaporeans, then why not?

In returns, the PAP can promise him to promote football and multi-racism and others (he can name them).  This is a win-win for him and Tony.    
  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...