Skip to main content

Sorry, Dr Tan Cheng Bock, your letter is not impressive


Hi, Dr Tan,

I receive your letter together with the polling card.  I am not impressed by your letter because your envelope has no logo, no name and no indication of a Presidential candidate.  It looks like a junk mail or a letter from a property agent.

Here is your letter and the ‘not so caring’ envelope:


What a disappointment!  Without the strong PAP machinery you can’t even produce a proper letter.

As I have mentioned in my previous post,Will Cheng Bock withdraw from the race for the good of Tony?/2011/08/will-cheng-bock-withdraw-from-race-for.html you have already completed your mission to make sure that there is a contest for PE2011.  I thank you for your effort but sorry, I can’t vote for you. 

Looking at your envelope, it seems you have no confidence in winning.  How can I vote for someone who has no intention to win?

Many a time the government and main stream media complain and criticise anonymous writers.  And they claim these writers are not credible.  If this is true, it applies to you too.      

I now show you the example of a winning envelope.  This is what I mean fighting spirit and determination to win.



If you are the other PAP preferred candidate, I will not bother to write this short note.

Best regards.

PS

I have made up my mind.

MAJULAH SINGAPURA! TAN JEE SAY FOR PRESIDENT

Lighting up Jee Say is for rebuilding Singapore.
Burning wood for Tony will make life more miserable.

钦点亮如斯，再造新加坡 
烧清木庆炎，如火中加油

The Chinese words use the meaning of the Chinese names of the four candidates.  Tan Kin Lian is ‘light’ and he uses his emperor light (钦亮) to light up Tan Jee Say, whose name means this is the way, something like this (如斯).  The light together with the normal way of doing thing will help Singapore to rebuild itself. 

On the other hand, Tan Cheng Bock is green and clear wood (清木).  Burning wood and add it to the celebrated fire (庆炎), the end result is terrible i.e. Singaporeans will suffer more and more.

Hence, voters should drop Cheng Bock and Tony. Kin Lian will have to scarify himself to help Jay See to build a better Singapore.

Dr Tan Cheng Bock, please don’t add any more wood to Tony to help burning the fire stronger and stronger as we are already under fire from the government.

We want some one with a heart to help us!

   

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...
275 comments
Read more

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...
65 comments
Read more

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...
50 comments
Read more