Skip to main content

钦点亮如斯,再造新加坡。 烧清木庆炎,如火中加油。


看过了4位总统候选人在《海峡时报》的圆桌会议,只能说
陈如斯应该在 827日当选成为新加坡下一任总统。他在回答有关总统薪金的第一个问题时,就是以下层人民的利益做为出发点,以最底层雇员的薪金作为起点来计算总统的薪金。因此,他最能关怀民生,可以协助政府凝聚国人,共创未来。

中午,亲耳再听到陈如斯在提名中心的短短二分钟演说,更加让人坚信投陈如斯一票是对的。他说,如果当选总统,他有责任制衡政府,反映民心,让政府以国人的利益做出发,管理国家。他的竞选口号是‘国家的良心’。他要管好国家储备,也要保护好公积金。同时,政府应该把经济成长的利益,公平的分配给人民。

有人质疑,陈如斯是不是去错提名中心,总统不是权力的中心,为何要制衡政府,提这么多意见,好像要执政一样。但是,不论,政府还是总统,都要有一颗良知的心,总统虽然不是权力中心,但是,如果连提出问题的道德良心都没有,那么,这不是白领干薪的总统吗?

因此,其他3位候选人就只能落选了。 他们的牺牲将能协助点燃新加坡之火,让新加坡精神重现。他们的牺牲是应该的,同时也是值得的。

钦亮大我牺牲,以亮光照亮如斯

陈钦亮要有大我牺牲的精神,以他本身的亮光亲自钦点照亮陈如斯,让新加坡重新拾回信心,不分裂,凝聚起来,创造一个更加美好的新加坡,一个新加坡人优先的新加坡。因为,如果我们投选陈清木,他的木材只能加速陈庆炎的火焰,陈庆炎不解民心,不知道民间疾苦的思维,将协助政府,火上加油,人民将会进一步生活在水深火热之中。

所以,简单的总结将是陈钦亮亲自点亮陈如斯,再造新加坡,让新加坡恢复生气,恢复新加坡精神。而陈清木,如果烂烧自己,以本身的木料加热陈庆炎,就只能热上加热,有如火中加油一样,人民的生活,将会苦不堪言。



道德勇气 国家良心

唯一选择:投选陈如斯

所以,选择只有一个:投选陈如斯,我们才能如此正常,如斯的过着平常的日子。我们不要再以‘高经济增长’作为快乐的指标,那是,陈庆炎和政府一直要开出的支票,一张可能无法兑现的‘空头支票’。即使能够兑现,国人的精神痛苦将会进一步恶化。

今早搭地铁时,看到地铁车门的警告语:小心空隙,不要靠在门上。回想一下,我们应该小心陈庆炎的空隙,他会像那丹一样,让政府有太多的空间可以自由的动用储备。而我们过去这么多年来,一直依靠政府,总统,同一个思维的做事方法,是不是应该不要再依靠下去了。

我们坐地铁,搭巴士,每天都要注意空隙,不要依靠。所以,投票时,也不要依靠政府指定的候选人 - 陈庆炎。投他一票,就是原地踏步,没有进步可言。

不论有几位对手,总统选举的胜利者只有一位。他就是陈如斯。


点亮如斯 造福人民


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...