Skip to main content

陈钦亮肯定比哈莉玛有所为。至于尚达曼,他与哈莉玛同一个背景,表现如何,真是一个未知数?

 陈钦亮肯定比哈莉玛有所为至于尚达曼,他与哈莉玛同一个背景,表现如何,真是一个未知数?


肯定和不肯定,你要吃哪一个凤梨?投陈钦亮是榴莲包吃,投尚达曼,没有人敢担保,凤梨一定甜。


总统选举向来都是行动党的如意算盘,大家关心的是谁是它的代表。以尚达曼的名气,国内大受欢迎,一般的假设,他一定会中选,表现也一定比哈莉玛好。表面上看,似乎没有问题。一个聪明,有主见的人,肯定比相对不聪明的哈莉玛好多了。这是行动党的设想,但是,世界上很多聪明人,最后也沦落到无所作为;甚至还是帮凶。陈庆炎就是一个无作为的总统。


陈钦亮肯定会比哈莉玛来得强,来得有所为。这不是说,他会与政府对着干。而是,在亲民,在反映民情上,比较主动,更加愿意与搭巴士德士地铁的人沟通,也愿意到小贩中心,邻里商店、咖啡店走动。这是他的真性情,一种自然、随意、乐意与普通老百姓来往。比一比,尚达曼和黄国松是否如此?


行动党的候选人,除了第一任总统王鼎昌外,那丹,陈庆炎和哈莉玛,有哪一个做到走入民间。难道,尚达曼会是一个意外?他的“相互敬重”,只在他的同温层,既得利益者之间,才发挥最大作用。因此,在昨晚的论坛上,陈钦亮特意系上和王鼎昌一样的领带,以追随王鼎昌的风范为目标。所以,他的表现肯定比哈莉玛来得好。


尚达曼会不会比哈利玛还要无作为,真的是一个大问号?主流媒体和社交媒体一直看不起陈钦亮,即使他是莱佛士书院毕业生,还是看他不顺眼,发音不美,有时还词不达意。不过,陈钦亮是见过世面的人,担任过由65国家组成的国际保险公司联盟的主席。把它说成不具国际观,对于这个国际组织是一项侮辱。他对中国所取得的成绩,给予肯定,赞赏;不以国家制度来衡量中国。



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...