Skip to main content

一场打工皇帝的选举? 总统候选人合格证书不重视企业精神、打拼人生?

 一场打工皇帝的选举?

总统候选人合格证书不重视企业精神、打拼人生?


单单从总统候选人资格认证这件事,总统选举委员会似乎告诉国人,企业精神、企业家、打拼人生,并不讨喜,份量不高,努力一生累积的经历,委员会看不上,因此,不够格。当然,这是依据宪法做出的的判断。


合格书的发出,也正反映出,新加坡不是一个企业创新的天堂,也没有适合创业、企业从小发展到大的环境,我们更加看重的是打工皇帝的服务。从部长到总裁,不需要努力创新,出尽脑力发展出一个企业。而是怎么样把现有的企业做大管好。


在某一个程度上,这是忽视、忽悠、羞辱、不重视企业精神。


星展集团总裁高博德在“重新创造命运:李光耀先生诞辰100周年会议”上指出,我国的庞大储备金具有资本上的战略优势,政府应该利用这些储备金,创造竞争优势。扩大在新领域、新行业的影响力,并且考虑在本区域进行长期投资。这样做需要冒更加大的风险,以及需要更加敏锐的企业眼光。


高博德也感觉到新加坡越来越害怕失败。我们越有钱,越害怕失去更多。“重新创造命运”命题,似乎变成一个伪命题,重什么新,创什么造?命运又如何改变。合格证书的发出,打压企业精神,认可打工皇帝,我们还是继续服务他人的老路。但是,在老路上,你去哪里找一个李光耀,重新创造未来的新加坡?


那么,哪一个候选人最像打工皇帝中的皇帝?尚达曼无疑是第一人选。他从来就没有离开政府、公务。人民行动党在国会的绝对优势,让他没有后顾之忧,发挥打工本色。黄国松长期在政府投资公司工作,后期才自行成立本身的投资公司,但是,继续和政府有生意上的往来。陈钦亮在职总英康打工时,把资产从2800万元,增加到170亿元。他已经离开职总英康超过15年。现在从事保险、投资、金融方面的咨询工作。


总统选举委员会的合格书,尚达曼和黄国松是依据公共服务的基础发出。而陈钦亮则是以私人企业为依据,取得合格认证。如果,这次总统选举,真的有一点企业精神的鼓励,那就是陈钦亮的加入选战。或许,他代表了半个企业家,安慰了没有取得资格的企业家吴振华。吴呼吁新加坡企业家要更加努力。



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...