Skip to main content

跟尚达曼说不 3 突破PAP观念束缚,不是你说什么就是什么。 高票当选,等于行动党大胜。

 跟尚达曼说不 3

突破PAP观念束缚,不是你说什么就是什么。

高票当选,等于行动党大胜。


新加坡有一个固定的观念,只要人民行动党说什么,就是什么,它说的,就是对的。机会来了,这个无形的行动党魔咒,选民现在有机会打破了。只要跟尚达曼说不,就做到了。


破了集选区,破了贪污神话,破了自行定义假新闻,

破了部长告人顺风顺水。接下来,就是,破了总统选举的魔咒,只要有票在手,就有可能突破


民选总统是非政治性的。这是一个似是而非的观念。1993年以来,人民行动党就是这样教育国人。很多新加坡人也相信这套说法,接受这个观念,信以为真,只要离开脱党,就是独立候选人。


这个观念,或者概念,一直受到挑战。为了逃避挑战,最简单的方法,就是没有对手,自动当选。这个最直接简单的做法,已经用了几次。但是,总不能每次都都没有对手。行动党政府,为了达到包赢的目的,修改宪法,创造了少数族群的候选人制度。这导致,半个印度人,当了原本属于马来人的总统位子。


人民的观念中,这一次是公开选举,理应由非少数族群人出任总统,但是,行动党偏偏指定一个少数族群的前部长出来。当然,目地就是要证明,只要是能人,不管环境如何,就能胜出。既然如此,何必多此一举,修法改变原本的选举制度。


行动党不断的制造包赢的局面。偏偏竞选投票,具有一定风险,谁也不敢说一定赢。因此,这是一项有输赢的政治游戏。既然有输赢,就有可能突破行动党的魔咒。


如果尚达曼中选,下一次轮到非华人非马来人的候选人资格认证,那么,他很可能一任后再加一任,就是

一做12年。民主上说得过,但是,修改宪法似乎变成脱裤放屁。 


这是不是一种精神错乱的观念?而这种观念,就是要建立魔咒,让选民觉得有得选,不过,怎么选,都是行动党指定候选人胜出。你能接受这样的精神错乱的观念?


我们必须突破这种错误的观念,摆脱无形的行动党魔咒。 新加坡选民都知道,总统选举结果不会影响政府的施政、方向。因此,在2011年,各自发挥想象,自由投票,结果让行动党大惊失色。12年修整,元气恢复一些,现在自认,以尚达曼的强棒出击,有望高票中选。 你同意吗?




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...