Skip to main content

第一次倒挂,输掉多一个集选区。 第二次倒挂,总统选举也将输掉?

 第一次倒挂,输掉多一个集选区。

第二次倒挂,总统选举也将输掉?


2020年,全国大选,人民行动党爆冷输掉一个集选区。在选举期间,行动党的领军人物李显龙海报出现倒挂的画面。当然,效率奇高的党,很快的就修正过来。


2023年,总统选举,无独有偶,行动党支持的候选人尚达曼,也出现海报倒挂的画面。同样的高效率,海报一下子就翻正。翻正后,运气是否继续站在行动党那边,还是选民这边?不知道。


无论2020年,还是2023年,年轻选民的倾向、喜好是决定成功失败的关键因此相对年轻,理性,形象好的尚达曼,就占了优势。尚达曼一开跑,就得了便宜,主流媒体和社交媒体都有他的身影。再加上,尚达曼获得执政的行动党加持,在声势上,其他候选人无法相比。


一个最可能出任非华族总理的人,竟然说新加坡已经准备好接受非华族担任总理。人民心目中理想的非华族总理人选,就是尚达曼。而他居然选择竞选总统宝座。让人不禁啼笑皆非。这到底是不是一种骗票的手段?第四代行动党领导,已经看不到尚达曼这样高素质的非华族人选。第五代会有吗?因此,他的话把不可能说成可能,居心不良。


新加坡人不喜欢这种错位安排。如果今天李显龙下台,大多数人会同意和支持尚达曼出任总理。很不幸,在行动党的刻意安排下,逼我们做出心理上极为矛盾的选择,把一个总理人选错位的放在总统选举的位置上。单单这点,就让人看出行动党有多霸道,和不解民意。这个党依靠国会绝对优势,什么事情都做得出来。而一个有独立思考能力的尚达曼,竟然任意让党摆布,令人唏嘘。




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...