Skip to main content

藐视、愚弄总统职位,困扰国人。 黄国松是装傻,还是装不懂政治?两者皆是? 还是尚达曼不好意思开口,只好由黄国松代骂。

 藐视、愚弄总统职位,困扰国人。

黄国松是装傻,还是装不懂政治?两者皆是?

还是尚达曼不好意思开口,只好由黄国松代骂。


好一个黄国松,把“藐视总统职位,愚弄总统职位,困扰新加坡人”的帽子,硬往陈钦亮头上盖。黄国松以道德最高点批评陈钦亮和支持陈钦亮的反对党人。黄国松说:“陈钦亮依赖那些反对党领导人,怎么能说自己是独立候选人?这算哪门子独立?他有被那些反对党领袖操纵的危险。他们甚至说,那些支持他的人可能会被任命为总统顾问委员会成员。这难道不是一种贪污行为吗?”


他的贪污指控,如果倒转过来,是说行动党支持的尚达曼,很可能会出官非。贪污是一项很严重的指控,尤其是没有证据,贪污是不可以随便出口伤人。陈钦亮都还没有中选,黄国松就口出狂言。他真的没有想到,这句话也同样适用于尚达曼身上吗?而且,过去几任民选总统,都是和行动党关系密切,他指责的独立,操纵和贪污,是否也暗指这些前任总统?当然,也包括现在的候选人尚达曼。

坊间的流言流语,普遍认为尚达曼和黄国松是行动党代理人,一明一暗。因为他们都在政府部门、公司担任要职。所以,国人才会怀疑他们的独立性。黄国松也不否认自己曾经是体制内的人。甚至,尚穆根还很自豪的说,出现尚达曼这么优秀的候选人,不是行动党的错。


错与不错,最终还是选民决定。黄国松最好回顾一下,他的品行推荐人杨荣文的语重心长的话。2011年,为了阻止陈清木中选,行动党找上了他。不过,他只愿做一个备胎。可见,行动党一直把民选总统当成家事来处理。是否是肥水不流外人田,以及黄国松上述指责,大家自己判断,这里不做评论。


杨荣文还提出一个总统制度的问题。他认为很少新加坡人了解民选总统的机制。如果一个公共权威机构,不容易被普通人理解,其效用就无法良好运作。因此,他建议设立一个类似上议院、参议院的组织。这个机构具有一些否决权,也可以延迟法令,不过需要有各宗教和各种族的代表。


从1991年开始的民选总统制度,30多年后,依然不够健全,有待改善,甚至,如陈钦亮建议的一样,回归到国会任命的初心。民选总统一开始,就具有很浓厚的政治气氛,表面上大家都装傻,什么独立性,就是一旦脱离党员身份,就是独立,就可以忘掉过去的种种。就这一点,黄国松也反对,因为他认为尚达曼不够独立。一离开行动党,就变身成为政治独立人。


民选总统表面上,团结国人,实际上,越来越分裂国人。发展到今天的行动党和反对党对立局面,作为政府的行动党,很难说自己一点责任都没有。解铃还须系铃人,自作自受?



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...