Skip to main content

归队啦!搞定啦! 信任回归,希望重燃。 不要让2011的失望,再度发生。



 归队啦!搞定啦!

信任回归,希望重燃。

不要让2011的失望,再度发生。


三位合体,再创新高!  带来希望,创造信任。


陈钦亮,陈清木和陈如斯,2011年的三位候选人合体,团结就是力量,信任他们,给他们信心,把12年前失去的,拿回来。是时候回来了,当年,花了多大的勇气,投票给他们三人。现在,也一样坚持信念,这一次把票集中在陈钦亮身上。


陈清木和陈如斯,做到了成人之美陈钦亮也一样有成人之美的心。如果吴振华拿到合格书,他愿意退出竞选,成全吴振华。可惜,总统选举委员会不愿意发出合格认证给吴振华。不然,吴振华将代替他们三位出征总统大位。


三陈都有成人之美的心。他们站出来,不畏惧执政人民行动党的各种挑战、障碍、阻拦,给新加坡一个选择总统的机会。成功不必在我,为人民发声,沟通民间和政府的联系,现在的希望,只能集中在陈钦亮身上。


陈钦亮只是一个普通人。就像邻里老伯,地铁巴士德士都可以。小贩中心,食阁,有没有冷气也无所谓。他自认是一个节俭的人,量入为出,因此,对于储备金,他会以保险的态度,保护好它。他呼吁年轻人要有一定的储蓄和保险,不要做不必要的花费。


三位合体,冲击了黄国松的选情。黄国松认为,陈清木和陈如斯两位有政党背景的人,虽然以个人名义支持陈钦亮,但是,在他看来已经“违宪和不尊重总统”。这不止令人担忧,而且是不健康的现象。从1991年开始,我们就见怪不怪,人民行动党一直在背后支持前部长前议长出来竞选,为何到现在才大彻大悟?


难怪,本身是候选人的陈钦亮,也认为我们应当回归到国会委任总统的初心。正如,黄国松说的,将总统选举政治化和两极化是对总统职务的不敬。是谁把总统选举和全国大选搞得难解难分,分不清。为何黄国松不去问一问尚达曼,他是不是得了便宜还卖乖?哎呀!黄国松很难理解什么是成人之美,什么是成功不必在我。他也很难理解在新加坡搞反对党政治有多难!



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...