Skip to main content

尚达曼赢在起跑点,会不会输在最后一里路?

 尚达曼赢在起跑点,会不会输在最后一里路?


犹如小学入学,尚达曼的起跑点已经在总统选举前,超前其他候选人好多好多。最强候选人,大材小用,高智商,高情商,媒体企图把他塑造成一个完人,不可能落选,因为他是全民首选、最佳选择。


其他三个候选人,都是出生贫寒,两个早早出来打拼养家,另一个获得奖学金,得以完成学业。这简直就是王子与贫穷孩子的对比。我们不是仇富,这是事实,尚达曼真的了解民间疾苦吗?他可以在舒服温室里想国家大事,那么在极端困难的环境里,他是否可以以平常心,百姓情看世界?并且,共患难。


谈起他的“相互敬重”,似乎陷入风马牛不相及。一个占尽优势,处处获得媒体庇护的候选人,现在,要求所有人,大家一起互相尊敬。为了选票,基于一人一票,所以平等对待,无论贫富,每一张都要争取,都要尊重。突然,敬重就这么跑出来。


依照惯例,前部长是自然自动获得合格证书。尚达曼在合格证书上,也跑赢其他候选人。还有,黄国松说的,人人当他是VIP。这是一个有待改进的选举制度,它把候选人分别开来,有VIP之分,有合格证书之分。


合格证书在提名日前才发出,媒体报道这是政府速战速决的做法。提名日也安排在国庆群从大会后举行。事实上,大数据、人工智慧、反馈、调研等工作都一直在进行。为的是考虑哪一个组合的选举,才最符合起跑点的利益。


万千宠爱在一生,尚达曼是否如意成为总统?怎么样确保他走完最会一里路,完美胜出?我们看到很多政治上的选举意外,从包赢到意外输掉,尚达曼的运气如何?尚达曼承认,运气和环境造就了他的一生。这次,环境和运气是否又在站在他那一边?


天时地利人和,从集选区到全国性的总统选举,运气环境是否又再度降临?为什么他不等到2029年,轮到印度和少数族群总统候选人的时候出来,等待期间他还是可以继续担任资政。地利呢?在集选区大胜,名气高,就可以在全国造成同样的效果?人和?到底有多少人相信他的独立性?当局者迷,旁观者清。局内人如何独立判断。



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...