Skip to main content

邻里老伯陈钦亮 心系平淡生活中的 物价、房价和就业。

 邻里老伯陈钦亮

心系平淡生活中的

物价、房价和就业。


陈钦亮还没有出场,还没有取得资格认证,媒体就发声,他会选的很差,输得很惨;就像2011年的冬天,失去按柜金。这就是新加坡主流媒体的水准,不见人好,只会唱坏;不但没有鼓励,反而落井下石,见不得你好。


其实,每一个出来参与总统选举的人,我们都应该给予鼓励。因为,偏偏在新加坡能够取得资格认证的人,很少很少,凤毛麟角,可以说是难得的人才。为何要厚此薄彼,先入为主的定义准候选人?


陈钦亮的心是平静,就像邻里的老伯没有多求,选也可以,不选也可以,最重要是不要出现自动当选的局面。他也认为面对最强对手,赢面只有百分之十。唱衰反而让人觉得,害怕他把票拉走,黑马最后得胜。


陈钦亮的诉求也很简单,很平民。他希望和政府合作把生活费降低,让人们负担得起房价,还有就是提供就业机会。这似乎很没有远见,关心只是芝麻绿豆的事。试问,有几个国家能够把这几件小事做好?


一个准候选人说要互相敬重,如果衣食住行都满足不了,饿着肚子,没有房子,没有足够养家的薪水,何来敬重?另一个说要和习近平同桌吃饭,说到底人民有没有饭吃,有没有落脚的地方,和有没有像样的工作才是硬道理。习近平离我们平民百姓太远,太遥远。何况,这是外交部的工作。


陈钦亮平时爱坐巴士、德士、也骑脚车,游走于超市、小贩中心、邻里商店,也像国人一样,有空就到新山一日游。或许,他的生活太过平常,太过随便,他竟然建议开放总统府,每个星期六上午为脚车时间。


他也希望能够像已故总统王鼎昌那样,做一个人民总统。时不时的为国人,高歌一曲‘月亮代表我的心’。他了解,需要配合政府,才能为人民的衣食住行做到最好,让新加坡人过上安居乐业,以和为贵的富足生活。


刀郎十几年磨一剑,陈钦亮在过去的12年到底做了什么?他是不是静坐冥思,得失不计较,无人出来,他就出来,避免自动当选的可能。成功不在我,参不参与竞选,提名日就知道了。


不过,我们还是希望陈钦亮能够参与总统选举。而且,我们应该协助他,不要让他再一次失去按柜金。让唱衰的人,抬不起头来。


刀郎的‘罗刹海市’可以,为何陈钦亮不可以?十年磨一剑,就看今朝。

Comments

  1. 新加坡“选总统”这出戏让我感慨很深 -- 因为只要上维基百科一看,那么就知道所谓的“总统” -- 不过就是一颗“印章” -- 那就是对于政府动用储备金时盖上印章 -- 然后总统就成为戴罪羔羊 -- 我是说,如果储备金被错误的使用的话。然而,如果储备金的确是发挥了“为国为民”的作用,这功劳簿上的名字,很显然就是执政党 -- 绝对不会是总统。

    而总统对于某一些特定事件的“否决权”,其实也是假象 -- 因为总统的6个委员才能够决定总统是否可以应用他的权力。

    关于陈钦亮的参选,只要陈如斯不动如山,那么就可以保证他的按柜金袋袋平安。但是,如果陈清木参与竞选,他们他的选票就会比上一次的更低 -- 按柜金被没收不必怀疑。

    新加坡在野党的尴尬,就是虽然面对劣势,也还是没有办法推出适当的“候选人” -- 为竞选而竞选的游戏一旦玩得淋漓尽致的时候,所有的理念就会成为泡沫。

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...