Skip to main content

ANYONE BUT THARMAN 3 Failed in Home Building. Lacking care and respect.

 ANYONE BUT THARMAN 3

Failed in Home Building. 

Lacking care and respect.


If you look at the National Message by Lee Hsien Loong, the government indirectly acknowledges the failure to build a proper home for Singaporeans.  Look at the headlines - affordable housing, elderly welfare and trust.


Just  a month ago Tharman was in policy making.  A smart and intelligent senior statesman with full wisdom and international aspiration.  And now, he wants to be the president of Singapore.  To make improvement from outside rather than making changes within the government.  Respect for all which is most effective?


So, Tharman, as a team member, seems to run away from the responsibility and duty to cherish a Home and provide ‘extra help’ to Singaporeans.  His wisdom and mind of change will not be put in good use as a president.  No wonder, Ng Kok Song said he should return to the government to make a bigger contribution there.   


The opposition Workers’ Party also touched on the same issue of Home.  Not so much on affordability, but a home with a heart, caring, concerns and a new focus to bring back the Spirit of Singapore.  


Change. If you look at it from the ‘revitalised focus’ on improving life. 

No Change.  If we have not lost our spirit of building a better Singapore. 


Either way, Tharman, if elected, makes very little contributions to change or no change. The Elected Presidency is a wrong place for him.  The government in practice, under the constitution, can still refuse his calling for ‘respect for all’.  He has no right to make policy changes.


Anyone but Tharman.     

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...
275 comments
Read more

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...
65 comments
Read more

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...
50 comments
Read more