Skip to main content

占了便宜还卖乖,这就是尚达曼的真颜色。看清楚了吗?

 占了便宜还卖乖,这就是尚达曼的真颜色。看清楚了吗?


总统选举不是全国大选,别让总统选举变成全国大选的代理战。尚达曼这么说, 你相信吗?明明是在人民行动党政府的祝福下出场,却叫人不要搞成全国大选。或许,他忘了尚穆根说过,行动党派出最强候选人,难道,这是行动党的错吗?


每天夹着媒体光环,天天见报,电视也不见少上,尚达曼这不是占了便宜又卖乖吗?作为体制内的人,又是前任资深部长,他的高名气,高知名度,当然不可以和其他候选人相比。主流媒体和社交媒体对他的追捧比其他候选人都来得多。占尽优势还希望别人不要宣传。


占尽优势,希望对手不要把总统选举当成全国大选的心态来打。试问,这些候选人,如何制造自我宣传的机会,根据选举局的建议,这次大选连群从大会也不乐见。少了对于群从接触的机会,人民如何把自己的竞选宣言散播出去?


黄国松感叹,有些组织把尚达曼当上宾VIP,而把他当成普通人士NIP。这些组织认为尚达曼是政府代言人,而黄国松不是代言人。无可否认,有些组织把尚达曼当成自己人,而其他候选人则是外人。这种心态也凸显,他们把总统选举当成全国大选来对待。


吴振华的媒体顾问也批评《海峡时报》在处理有关宪法报公布提名日和投票日时,没有报道吴振华的反应,谈话内容。这种选择性报道,似乎也是全国大选的常态。尚达曼又占了便宜。


群从大会没有了,媒体又不把你当成上宾,有些组织害怕你访问它们,明明说好这是一场非政治性选举,但是,全国上下,却呈现出政府和非政府之争,心态上认定这是建制派和反对派的争斗。即使表面上与全国大选无关,与政治无关,选民在心理上,总会问一问谁是政府代表?谁最合政府的心意?


看来,有些人是甜在心里,却说了反话。



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...