Skip to main content

肃贪局不解风情,行动党未解民情,许宝琨不要同情。


问世间,情为何物,直教人生死相许。情情情,谁又能摸得透呢!

当然,换成是选情,那也一样叫人扑朔迷离。工人党李丽莲一介女流能独当一面绊倒几个壮男吗?国会里如果要多个女议员,要多个在野党议员,还非她莫属。榜鹅东选民请投她一票,许宝琨不需要您的同情票,因此,选民不需要同情行动党。

数字无法解决情事

贪污调查局对有关数目字的案件,很清楚,很有把握,但是一遇到情情爱爱,就糊涂了。徐秀兰是这样,高文慧也是如此,把自己的证人,申请成为敌意证人。明明是自己选出来的证人,为何敌意相向?

感情这件事,有时真叫人猜不透。那么民情又如何,行动党看得透吗? 现在,榜鹅东行动党候选人又说不要同情,不知道他要不要选民的好感情呢!他这么说,好像是要申请成为敌意行动党候选人。

是主控官不解风情,不知道情情爱爱的变数吗?还是力道不够,没有足够的智慧,找到切入点,一举攻破被告。情爱的真真假假,没有数目字可以作为根据,要如何证明这个情爱就是贪污行为,这可要考倒主控官了。

新加坡就是这样一个讲数目字的国家。经济增长,人均收入,移民数目,小六会考,各种考试,生产力,效率,什么事情会跟数目字无关呢!因此,整个国家在行动党数字化教育下,又如何能够清楚分辨出情情爱爱的真真假假。

主控官是如此,作为政府的行动党当然不能例外。个案的感情分不清楚,民间的人情世故,生活情况,由于无法数字化,也让行动党无法看得一清二楚,当然,民间发生的事情,行动党就只能依本身的数字化判断来决定了。

所以,后港补选,行动党朱倍庆要搞独立思维,现在,许宝琨也来‘我是我自己’,也要做个‘own man’. 他甚至比朱倍庆更加激进,不要你的同情票。

不要同情是进一步还是退一步,是不是以退为进?博取更多同情?因为,我们给贪污调查局的难辨情爱,搞到不知如何处理感情。给行动党的不解民情,搞到民怨四起。

I am sorry 不要同情=政治自杀

许医生似乎忘了总理的”I am sorry”


还记得2011年大选,总理怎么说吗?对不起,如果我们犯错,我们下次会改进。好多分析家认为,因为总理这句话,行动党得以保住60%的选票。现在,许宝琨不要同情,那他不是等于政治自杀了吗?

总理好辛苦,才说出一句对不起。但是,许宝琨,作为一位医生和护理人员,原本应该要有一个爱心,同情关怀病人。不知道,他会对他的病人说出,不要期待同情,你要自己照顾自己的话吗?

这也不就是行动党政府对待人民的态度吗?贫富悬殊;低收入人士,几十年没有实际工资增长;等待组屋,却看到房价一天一天上涨;地铁出事,是地铁公司出问题;。。。 人民受苦,行动党政府有没有伸出同情之心。正如许医生一样,不要同情,要自己努力。难怪,行动党把他推出作为候选人,这个道理思维是一样的。真搞不懂,他还一直在喊”this is me”, 他如何个me法,还不是跟行动党一样。

不要同情票,在选情非常紧迫的选举中,就是政治自杀。在2011年大选中,波东巴西和如切单选区的选民如果同情在野党多一点,整个选情就改变了。看来许宝琨很有把握能够以多数票当选,尤其看到多角战的出现,更是不需要同情票。

既然,他不要这些同情票,(他是否认为这是二等票,不值得一提),榜鹅东选民就把选票投给工人党好了。

许宝琨走共和党罗姆尼的路线

记得去年美国大选,罗姆尼说过不要低收入选民的票吗?(在罗姆尼心里,低收入选票有如二等选票)他这么做当然就只有落选的命运。同样回头看看行动党,许宝琨似乎也不要低收入选民的票,因为行动党照顾不了这些人。看看罗姆尼怎么说:

罗姆尼对这些富翁坦承,他的策略就是关注金字塔顶尖的一部分尚未决定投票给谁的人,对于低收入选民,他无意争取他们的选票。 
有关罗姆尼当天演讲的视频被分为几个片段传到了网上,其中一个片段是有关税收的。不管怎样,都将有47%的人把票投给奥巴马。罗姆尼这里指的是不用交纳收入税的美国人。47%的人支持奥巴马,他们依赖政府,认为自己是受害者,认为政府有责任照顾好他们。这些人相信自己有权利得到医疗保健、食物、住房等等……我的工作就是不为这些人操心。我也不会去说服他们,让他们知道照顾好自己是个人的责任。
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/hqzx/2012-09/19/content_15766531.htm


行动党还是不知道自己的问题在哪里?行动党不要选民同情,一方面当然是无法照顾到这些人的利益,更加重要的是,行动党和共和党一样只想照顾上层人士的利益。因此,选民根本不需要同情行动党,而是应该进一步的把行动党的票数拉低,越低越好。而总理的“I am sorry”,则可以把它当成耳边风。

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...