Skip to main content

Aim High Aim Low and Que Sara Sara


PM Lee Hsien Loong has fired his first shot in the Singapore conversation between his party owned AIM and Aljunied-Hougang Town Council.  Instead of openly supporting his party company AIM and party man Dr Teo Ho Pin’s explanation on the dispute or debate or whatever you like to name it, he shot a blogger by issuing him a lawyer’s letter.

This is really a unique way of shooting a target and perhaps this is his usual practice by not telling you where his real target is.   So, we don’t know his position about the AIM-AHTC-Dr Teo argument and which side he is supporting.

By nature, AIM, a fully owned PAP company and Dr Teo, a PAP MP, PM Lee must send a clear signal to Singaporeans that he, as party secretary-general, fully, totally and 100% support the points raised and statements issued by AIM and Dr Teo.

We are disappointed so far he has not said anything to support his AIM and Dr Teo. However, he surprised Singaporeans by aiming at a blogger.

Aim high, aim low and the aim is not to shoot the target as what we see from a distance.  In fact, AIM, Dr Teo, AHTC and even PM Lee are all aimlessly shooting no target.  They have all missed the target.  Que sara sara. Maybe they are all politicians.

The AIM saga has so far reached its highest point as finally we see the Prime Minister entered the saga by a side door.  Unfortunately, it has also reached its lowest point of lawsuit and apology.

‘Whatever will be, will be’ as the song ‘Que sara sara’ goes along.  Will I be pretty, rich and handsome? Are these targets easily reachable as everyone is aiming for and looking for?  Not that easy and so whatever will be, will be.

Interestingly,  ‘Que sara sara’ is a song from the 1956 movie ‘The man who knew too much’.  Who know too much in the AIM saga?  The ones who know little like bloggers ask too much and the ones who know a little more pretend to be open, transparent and claim that they have released all the information.  

As party secretary-general, PM Lee should be the one who know more than we do.  As AIM directors and Dr Teo have to report to him, he should know more than all of them put together.  PM and the PAP CEC should have a clearer and better picture than all of us.

But PM chooses to shoot at targets randomly and aimlessly and so we see no whole picture but part by part.

Sometimes, it is hard to guess what target PM Lee is aiming at.  In an old shooting incident in Brunei many years ago before he became PM, even Peter Lim, the then editor-in-chief of Straits Times Group, also got it wrong.  

PETER LIM RECOGNIZED a good story. It was the late 1980s, and Lim, then editor-in-chief of Singapore's Straits Times Group, was accompanying Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew to Brunei when he witnessed an episode that left him amazed. Invited to try out a new semi-automatic rifle, the prime minister sprayed bullets through the nearest target on a firing range; when it came to his son's turn, Lim reported, former Brig.-Gen. Lee Hsien Loong missed with every round. 
After publishing the story, however, Lim was bawled out by an officer who told him Lee Hsien Loong hadn't been aiming at the targets. When Lim contacted Lee, he confirmed that he had been getting the feel of the rifle and wasn't trying to hit anything in particular. Lim apologized and offered to publish a correction. 
Much to Lim's surprise, Lee, who had not long before left the armed forces and become a government minister, criticized the officer for his approach, and told Lim not to worry, that it wasn't important.http://www.singapore-window.org/sw04/040819fe.htm


Even Peter Lim can get it wrong; one will wonder how a blogger can get it right.

Whatever will be, will be. PM Lee is not aiming at any blogger in particular.  He is like what he did in Brunei “
wasn't trying to hit anything in particular.”

Sometimes, to be “the man who knew too much” is no good and can be dangerous too.

Que sara sara may be a better option in life!
  

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...
275 comments
Read more

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...
65 comments
Read more

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...
50 comments
Read more