Skip to main content

Empowered Ignorance? From SMRT to Hougang


Only u HG 不离不弃后港情2

“Consensus among the ignorant is still ignorance.” – George Elliott

We have seen the result of an ignorant CEO at SMRT.  As a CEO, she was empowered to carry out the job of first world metro system.  But at the end we need a public inquiry on MRT breakdowns as we have over trusted and empowered her to do a good job. This is really a heavy price for Singapore!

Do we still need another PAP ignorant MP in the Parliament? It will not do any good for Singapore as the consensus among the PAP ignorant MPs is still ignorance about the people, especially the lower income people and Hougang residents.

Can ’I am my own man’ raise national issues?

The Hougang PAP candidate for the by-election is from NTUC.  Has he raised the issue of lower income workers? Besides providing free medical, legal and food to Hougang residents, can he as “I am my own man’ voice out the national issue of lower income workers, housing, education or other issues. Perhaps, there is already a consensus for the PAP ministers and MPs to voice out in one same message – productivity before wages increase.  Can he go beyond the party line?

Hougang, as a typical Singapore heartland, does have lower income workers and the braved one, who requests for a court hearing on by-election, is also a lower income worker as stated in her statement.  Same as Workers’ Party, she wants to have an early by-election so that the new MP can take care of her needs – the typical need of lower income families.  And the PAP, PM and the PAP candidate for Hougang are quite ignorance about her basic need.   

No wonder the PAP only wants to talk about local issues at the by-election.  They have already reached consensus and group think about low income workers, public transport, housing, education and other national issues.

Assistance is not teaching fish catching

The PAP candidate Desmond Choo is his own words:

[One thing I will champion in Hougang: Assistance schemes, such as for health, education, transport and job matching; and a free legal clinic'I want the residents to know that I am my own man, that I have my own vision for Hougang, that I've...executed my plans, and there's more that I can do. So, having party bigwigs here or not is not going to distract me from how I want to run my campaign in Hougang.' (ST 11 May 12)]
Health, education, transport and jobs are national issues.  Without the support of party bigwigs, can you cut Upper Serangoon Road into two, build another school or hospital, or create more jobs? This is why Choo said he could only provide assistances.  And assistance is not teaching people how to fish.

Different empowerment (and different result) of SMRT and Hougang

From SMRT to Hougang, we see the difference of empowerment. Only in Hougang, you are given a chance (reluctantly) to empower your new MP.  While for SMRT, the CEO is appointed and surely there is no reminder of pubic duty and responsibility.  So, the CEO only looks at profit, money and productivity.

Whoever wins the by-election in Hougang is challenged and reminded by his duty to serve the Hougang residents and as a wider responsibility in the Parliament of Singapore. It is suggested that all key appointments of public infrastructure and organisations must go through a public duty and responsibility test.  Otherwise, they will think that they are joining a profit making, business oriented private company.    

Only you, the Hougang voters stand tall to remind the government in the past 20 years on the duty of government, public service and responsibility.  Now, there is a chance to empower your representative again, what are you waiting for, hesitating for? 

Comments

  1. The COI has thus far shown up our world class MRT transport system. From an operator that focus on profits and retailing and neglects engineering and maintenance to a regulator that is clueless and generally going motion of inspection and audit. It was probably fortunate that the system was falling apart and did not crash. Imagine train derailment or collision

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting

因为有比较, 才知道做得不够, 才明白什么叫做易通。

  因为有比较, 才知道做得不够, 才明白什么叫做易通。 如果只有一套解决方法,很难看出好坏,方便还是不方便,易通还是不容易通。用新方法代替旧的系统,人们当然会做比较,尤其是科技产品,使用的人很多,一用就马上看到结果。 这是一个竞争的世界,即使一党独大,也要考虑到便民。当人民觉得不方便,不好用,不易通,就会反映,发声,不满。为什么没有预先想到,最可怕的是测试时,已经接到反应,还是不加改善。或许,行动党还抱着“令伯”最大,用者自行解决问题。 易通公交收费系统的整合,似乎缺少一种人文,沟通,反而更加多表现出政府的独断独行。尤其重要的是,如果只有一套系统,我们是看不出问题,做不出好坏的评价。 这其实证明国会里不可以只有一把声音,没有比较,没有进步。

After 60 years, after 3 failed political imaginations, the PAP is deteriorating...