Skip to main content

一个低薪工友打败一个世界最高薪的总理



是的。没有听错,最少在一人一票,民选制度,以及在法律正义面前,我们的法庭还是能起到一定的作用。

听到后港补选的消息,第一个反应是一个低薪的后港选民,加上一个维权律师,在法庭开庭前,打败世界上最高薪水的总理。在一人一票,法律依据下,世人面前,尤其是我们所依循的西方民主选举制度下,不举行补选,日久之后,很可能会变成国际笑话,让外人知道我们的选举制度到底是什么一回事?

总理虽然事情很多,忙到没有时间理会这种小事,但是,作为选民,低薪工友有权利向法庭要求,为何高薪的总理可以不要及时举行补选,法庭也有必要做出让人信服的判决。因此,选在516日作为提名日,同时也是法院开庭日,那就有点像电影连续剧所说的“有如雷同,纯属巧合‘。

谁欠谁一个人情?

总理在面簿上的解释,好像后港选民欠他一个人情,现在,让后港选民有一个补选的机会,这些选民还要谢谢他呢!在民选制度下,选民的权利是否是总理可以左右的,可以随意以事忙作为借口,不尽快补选,既然如此,那么低薪选民,为了保障本身的选民利益,就只有向法庭请示,做出判决了。

当然,总理更希望把战场控制在后港选区而已,把选战议题集中在后港区,不要涉及到全国性的议题。因为,他现在正忙着处理全国事务,交通,住屋,甚至低薪,低收入家庭的问题。这一年来,不止没有把问题压下,还好像问题越来越多。把选战归属于区内问题,对行动党自然有利一些。

但是,总理的举棋不定,没有在第一时间宣布补选,最终导致低薪的后港选民,向法庭要求解释选民权利,向世界最高薪水的总理提出挑战。这么一来,原本是一场局部的选战,在总理和他的高薪顾问团的操作下,就演变成为全国性的法庭解释选民权利的议题。因此,谁是第一个把后港补选变成全国性议题的人,应该相当清楚了。解铃还须系令人,现在看总理,如何把大事化小,把全国议题变回区内问题。

低薪人士的力量,可以绊倒总理

看起来,高薪不一定能把事情搞好。低薪人士也一样能够让人头疼,尤其是有维权律师和法庭的协助,我们在处理很多事情时,在维护正义的条件下,虽然想不补选或延缓补选,但是,全国的选民在看,世人的注视和关心,不容我们把事情恶化到成为国际笑话。
低薪选民能够通过法庭绊倒高薪的总理,当然也可以绊倒其他的人,甚至政府。我们还真要谢谢这些有心人,没有他们的牺牲,我们也看不到这精彩的一幕。

如果再进一步的想,低薪选民的加薪一定要以生产力为前提,那么,有一天,当他们低薪无法再活下去时,他们就不再通过法庭,而是用自己手中的一票,把不给他们加薪的政府推倒。这次利用法庭,逼到总理做出补选的决定一样,或许只是一个开始,以后很可能还有更好的戏看。法国,希腊政府倒台,也就是一个活生生的例子吗?

高薪能够做出正确的政治判断吗?

不过,总理这次做出补选的决定,也是有代价的。将来,不知道会不会有更多的选民向法庭要求,对他们的选民权利做出合理的解释。不单单选区如此,集选区也可能会出现相同的问题。还有,其他的公民权利,也都可以向法庭要求解释。这原本是后港单选区的事情,给总理这么一拖,这么一不明确表态,就变成全国性的问题,看来高薪也不一定能够做出正确的决定,尤其是,正确的政治判断。

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By inserting a single c

After 60 years, after 3 failed political imaginations, the PAP is deteriorating...