Skip to main content

COI on MRT breakdown: HAVE WE GOT THE BASIC RIGHT?



Like the MRT, our past efficient public administration has suffered a setback in recent years.  The more the government is eyeing for profit maximization, the more social and political issues the PAP has to face.  The MRT breakdown is not an isolated case. It represents the Singapore problem as a whole.  Just like the Hougang by-election, it is a local as well as a national level election.

The current COI on MRT breakdown has been going on for several weeks, however, has it got the basic right?  Have we looked at the human resource strategy and management of SMRT?  Is there a shift from engineering to marketing? Is there a policy to retain old and experienced but expensive workers? Or the worst situation is to replace expensive locals with cheap foreigners.   

Our MRT system has been in operation since 1980s. Only recently we experience the frequent breakdowns as often as a daily happening. We do not have operation problems at the beginning in 1980s as well as in the 1990s and 2000s.   Why suddenly there are so many problems? Are the current management and staff less competent and efficient than before? Or there is a shift of focus on the core value of public transport service?

We know the operations of public infrastructure usually face great challenges when it first runs into operations, like the opening of a new airport.  Delay, new problems for new system, staff training, and co-ordination etc. will always challenge the new airport management.   However, after that, it is usually a smooth operation unless the maintenance is not up to date. 

All infrastructures at the end of the day are still handled by human beings. If there is a quality shift of the workers, or a preference towards certain groups of employees, or a change of profit focus, all these will affect the performance of SMRT staff. The COI is only looking at the system, so even the system is corrected, there is no guarantee staff attitude towards work, the same old service standard can come back.

Perhaps, we should look at the management attitude, style and emphasis towards service and profit. Is there any difference or change of attitude between past and present (Saw Phaik Hwa) management.   Why the COI never asked Saw to compare her HR strategy before and after her CEO appointment?

A CEO’s attitude and decision on HR and her preference will affect the direction and service to the customers. It seems the passengers as the first customers have been replaced by tenants of retail space.  Such development will result to the drop of importance of maintenance staff and engineers.  An experienced and dedicated staff can recognize the problems before it occurs.  However, an inexperienced and new staff will not be able to do the same. Hence, you can spend the same amount of money and even increase the budget for maintenance but if the ‘heart of serving’ is no more there, MRT breakdowns will still be there and always be there.

This is the same as the government.  After spending so much money on upgrading pleasing the people, Singaporeans are still not happy. This is because the ‘heart of serving’ is missing, just like the PAP has forgotten the true meaning of Mother’s Day. (http://pijitailai.blogspot.com/2012/05/pap-has-forgotten-true-meaning-of.html)

This is why SMRT now has to engage its engineers, love their engineers, and give more attention to engineers. Only when the ‘heart’ of engineers is back to SMRT, it then can promise a problem less metro system. And it is, in fact, an HR problem and certainly, SMRT needs to look at its own history on how to become an engineering company, not a profit maximization company.      

[SMRT Corp will be repositioned as an engineering company, its chairman Koh Yong Guan revealed on Friday.
Mr Koh said that he was not 'comfortable' that although the rail operator's core business was trains, not enough attention was given to its engineers.
To this end, the chairman said he has reviewed the salary scales of executives with engineering roles and invited a senior engineering vice-president to sit in at board meetings. He has also set up a 'trains board', comprising largely of engineers who will focus their attention on train operations and maintenance.
'At the board level the senior-most person who is responsible for the operation of the rail system was not directly there to answer to the board,' he said, explaining why he had asked SMRT Trains executive vice-president Khoo Hean Siang to sit in at board meetings. (ST 12 May 2012)]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

因为有比较, 才知道做得不够, 才明白什么叫做易通。

  因为有比较, 才知道做得不够, 才明白什么叫做易通。 如果只有一套解决方法,很难看出好坏,方便还是不方便,易通还是不容易通。用新方法代替旧的系统,人们当然会做比较,尤其是科技产品,使用的人很多,一用就马上看到结果。 这是一个竞争的世界,即使一党独大,也要考虑到便民。当人民觉得不方便,不好用,不易通,就会反映,发声,不满。为什么没有预先想到,最可怕的是测试时,已经接到反应,还是不加改善。或许,行动党还抱着“令伯”最大,用者自行解决问题。 易通公交收费系统的整合,似乎缺少一种人文,沟通,反而更加多表现出政府的独断独行。尤其重要的是,如果只有一套系统,我们是看不出问题,做不出好坏的评价。 这其实证明国会里不可以只有一把声音,没有比较,没有进步。

梁文辉可能有点傻, 但却是真的真情流露。

 

失落,焦虑,无所适从,。。。 PAP支持者努力找回往日的 光辉、信任、初心?

  失落,焦虑,无所适从,。。。 PAP支持者努力找回往日的 光辉、信任、初心? 人民行动党让支持者无所适从。 他们失去方向,漫无目的的寻找可以安抚、可以发泄的地方。他们甚至把怒火发泄在反对党身上,把自己的错误怪罪于他人。 语无伦次,失态,失落,焦虑,其实正反映了行动党领导在沟通,危机处理,应变能力方面出现很多、很大问题。支持者没有获得足够的信息, 当然就无法配合演出。 时不我与, 怪谁? 一向信任的党,突然变得很陌生,今天的行动党不是以前的行动党。支持者的失落、失魂、不知所措,可想而知。支持者发现初心不在,信任可疑,焦虑又担心行动党如何走下去? 即使想帮忙,也无所适从,不知如何下手,因为只能向其他人一样,看电视报纸。然而,这种管道已经越来越起不了作用和沟通效率。行动党支持者的心理变化,外人很难理解, 精神领袖不在,党内难念的经,又不止一本,而是好几本。 (就像巫统和国民党的忠实支持者那样,看到巫统和国民党发展到现在这个阶段,他们的失落感,急切寻找党魂,不知所措,如何才可以听到正确的指引,找回失去的初心,重新信任党和安慰焦虑的心。行动党最后的安慰,很可能是到目前为止,还没有明显的内乱。或许有,我们也不知道,只是还没有表面化罢了。) 人民行动党的支持者,尤其是忠实的老支持者,对于党发展到今天,一定忧心重重。 几十年的精神支柱,一下子变得信心动摇,焦虑,帮不上忙,甚至,无所适从,不知所措。 支持者没有了方向,党又选择性的提供和一般人一样的信息,甚至误导、片面、一知半解、画蛇添足 、不知所云的解释,对于支持者来说,这是不足够的。久而久之,他们也开始怀疑党,透明度不够, 以救国为名,实际上,就是救党,维护既得利益者。