Skip to main content

横眉冷对闪电雨 俯首敢为后港人 行动党的阿Q精神


Only u HG 不离不弃后港情11

路是人走出来的。后港人已经领头先走出第一步,其他新加坡人可以继续在这条小道上发扬光大,把小路变大路,走出后港,走出阿裕尼,走遍全国。就是这样一条小路,行动党就想连根拔起,害怕春风吹又生,但是,21年的奋斗和坚持,难道这么容易被打败吗?

横着眉冷冷的对着行动党的闪电雨,后港人勇敢的站起来,不畏强权,不肯妥协,在风雨交加的夜晚和工人党站在一起,大家心连心,为民主,为正义,为理想而一起努力,一起奋斗。这股力量将会继续震撼着新加坡,发出的光,亮出的票,将再次奠定,肯定后港的历史地位,民主的堡垒。

俯着首挺着胸敢敢地甘愿地做个后港人。地铁不会中途不停后港,巴士不会不驶入后港转换站,后港商场不会人去楼空,后港的天空不会一片黑暗,反而是阳光普照,前途大好。因为又又多了一个工人党议员在国会制衡政府,监督政府,为人民说话,说心声。

人民的眼睛是雪亮的,尤其是后港人的眼睛

全国人民都在看后港补选的结果。行动党说工人党和工人党候选人诚信有问题,他们自认品格高尚,人品端正,但是,这不是行动党和行动党报纸电视说了就算了。后港人就偏偏要用照妖镜,照一照行动党,看看你们有多清高,有多高尚。人民的力量还是要尊重的,不是行动党利用一手遮天的手法,就能自圆其说的。人民的眼睛现在已经变得雪亮了,尤其是领头的后港人,更是早早就看透了行动党的心。

路是人走出来的, 横眉冷对千夫指,俯首甘为孺子牛,还有阿Q,都是鲁迅的名言名句名故事。相对于后港精神,行动党的在这次补选的选战策略,就真的可以说是阿Q精神了。临死前,还嫌自己的圆圈签名,画的不够圆。

行动党表演的是阿Q精神

为何说行动党是阿Q精神呢?一开始,行动党就定义这是一种地方补选,不是国家大事的讨论。这是行动党一个党员的独立参选的行为,不需要行动党头头的参与。这是一场清洁的选举,这是一场君子之战。民主是过程,自由是选择,但是,总理有权决定是否举行补选,一个人竟然对民主的诠释凌驾于其他人之上,总理说这是他的决定,这个决定可真阿Q。阿Q得在践踏民主,视选民的利益于不顾,还大言这是他的权力。是的,这可是霸权的象征啊!

Q说和尚摸得为何他摸不得,作为总理,他说,补选不补选,他可以做决定,他说了算了。但是,这种对民主的解释,压制,是人民可以接受的吗?是法庭可以接受的吗?下个月,法院将会对有关补选的选举权限做出解释,到时我们再看看结果如何。因此,作为总理,有时也要像阿Q一样,摸不得就是摸不得,摸错了,就会出大事了。新加坡人的感受,人民对政治人物的观感是一定要注意的。不然,就和阿Q一样,在大街上游街时,还不知道自己死期将到。还自认是革命党人,好汉一条。

下一个阿Q,可能就是副总理张志贤了。他现在有如打虎英雄,打着诚信的大旗,一下说不是最佳人选,一下说工人党候选人和秘书长,前后说话不一致,有欺骗选民的意图。尽管工人党已经出示相关文件,打虎英雄还是要追问,就是一定要说工人党诚信有问题。事实上,这种选战的策略,就是行动党一路来的阿Q精神,无中生有,次次大选的都会出的招数。想不到,一个自己定义小小的地方补选,也要出动阿Q来压阵,真是不厌其烦。说到底,就是要利用主流媒体,达到工人党不老实的目的。

阿Q的行动党群众大会   相片来源:newnation.sg

背离人民,背离时代的行动党阿Q群众大会

后港补选的选战打到现在,已经接近尾声,行动党今晚的群众大会,不知又要出动多少临时演员,这种阿Q精神,行动党还是越用越开心,人民的话题也越多,越精彩。什么饮料,什么伙食,什么巴士,如何出场,如何进场,大人物何时出现,如何拍手,如何高喊,如何。。 如何。。这一幕幕阿Q的动作,阿Q的表演,已经是每次选举的笑话,看来阿Q真的不知道人民的要求,人民要看到的是真心表演。可见,行动党的政府,也是像阿Q一样,装出来的。如果不是这样,那么就是无知到底,选民难道看不出吗?小孩子都会问妈妈,为什么工人党群众大会没有东西拿,没有东西吃,人还这么多,这些人,出席工人党的群众大会,难道没有阿Q精神,只有后港精神后港魂吗?的确如此,这样才分出不同,分出高低,分出层次。

Q正在被押往刑场,渐行渐远。在后港精神的照射下,他离开群众太远,他离开时代太远,他正在孤独的走向死亡。。。。。。

526日后港的天空又再蓝天一片,铁锤又再一次牢牢的把民主的旗帜竖起。加油,大家一起努力,把行动党的阿Q精神送走。

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...