Skip to main content

后港精神后港魂 为谁辛苦为谁忙


Only u HG 不离不弃后港情9

去年大选过后,行动党就打出包容牌,但是,到底行动党的包容是什么一回事,一党专政,一党独大,一意孤行,没有反对的声音,唯我独尊,我最行,什么都是行动党最好。如果出现替代的方案和想法,行动党认为将会对国家有害,这算是包容吗?

因此,行动党希望,后港人不需要再坚持下去,让行动党来照顾你们,给你们提升,给你们福利,给你们吃,住,行的方便。工人党是没有财力物力提供这些援助,这些好处的。因此,后港人不需要再为他人辛苦,为他人忙了。你们已经辛苦了20年,应该休息了,像波东巴西那样重归行动党的怀抱吧!

这是行动党热烈盼望得到的好消息!包容有价,只要提出包容,选民就动心了。真的是这么一回事吗?民主的坚持真的这么容易放弃吗?后港精神后港魂,会这么容易放弃原则吗?全国人民都在看,都在期待,后港继续领跑,继续发扬民主,正义,不畏强权的精神。

我们对行动党太包容了

谈到包容,新加坡人民50年来对行动党政府已经太包容了。内安法还在,逮捕行为解释的不清不楚,逃马事件,也解释的不清楚,屋子房价高涨,移民政策,甚至名人嫖妓的第三份名单,也没有交代清楚。新加坡人可是容忍高手了,这么多年来还一直在包容行动党。现在,行动党还要反过来要求国人更加包容,真是人在做天在看,人民到底还要包容行动党到几时。

包容的结果是。。。

当年,行动党把南大关了,把华校了结了,推出讲华语运动,美其名说政府仍然重视华文,仍然关心华社,仍然有一颗包容南大精神,包容华校生,包容华人传统的心。但是,今天回头望一望,套用朱倍庆的话:我有我自己的一套做法。这套做法是表面上包容,事实上是毁灭。

当年叫年轻夫妇不要生太多孩子,两个就够了,结果是全国响应,大家都包容行动党,大家都不生孩子,搞到现在,需要大量的进口人口。

当年是居者有其屋,大家耐心等待,包容政府建屋子给人民。现在是没钱没有屋子,不是居者有其屋,政府组屋已经不是价廉物美,动不动也可以高达百万元。

当年建国要包容,现在经济发展起来,行动党更要人民的包容,怎么行动党不包容人民的要求。人民要求更多的自由民主,更多的自主权,更多的选择,怎么行动党没有看到听到,反而倒过来,拉起包容的布条,要求人民接受行动党的包容,不要接受在野党,替代的建议。

每个社会,国家,都需要不同思想,不同理念的人,同时,更要有人做出牺牲,才能为其他的人指出一条正确的路。包容不是行动党的包容,而是全国人民的包容,一个包容各种各样的声音,建议,和思想的社会。

后港包容一个非潮州候选人

后港毕竟是新加坡的一部分,工人党勇于,敢于委派非潮州候选人,就是要冲出潮州情结,潮州功夫茶的茶道。新加坡是一个多元种族多元文化的国家,后港的民主路要继续往下走,就是要冲破这种情结。这么做也可以证明后港人对民主的支持,不是基于潮州因素,而是基于一个更高更大的理想,要做为新加坡民主先锋,树立榜样,鼓励更多的人接受一个真正的包容社会,而不是行动党的狭义的包容,利己的包容。

20年来,后港一直都是潮州议员,现在,选民可以通过这次补选,告诉新加坡人,他们已经冲破潮州因素,潮州情结,向一个更高的目标前进,只要能为人民做出贡献,在国会发表不同的意见,后港选民就支持你。

行动党的包容,就像地铁公司的加薪

庄子的朝三暮四,暮四朝三的故事,怎么算都是七条香蕉,但是,让人看起来好像主人很包容,你们喜欢早上多一条香蕉,就让你们早上多一条,因此猴子们都很高兴。这就是行动党所谓的包容。新加坡人可不要被行动党当成猴子来玩。SMRT就是一个活生生的例子:

SMRT被轰加薪后,巴士车长每周工作从5天变6天,根本是加辛加薪SMRT宣布从本月起调高巴士司机薪金,但一群SMRT巴士司机立刻致函《新明日报》大揭,新加坡籍司机其实是面对变相减薪,因为他们每周工作日,从5天变成了6天。余先生代表一群SMRT巴士司机说,SMRT给巴士司机调整的薪金,做法和新捷运不同。根据新的薪金制度,SMRT的新加坡籍巴士司机每月加薪225元,永久居民和马国司机则每月加薪100元。做出决定前 已和工会讨论过;SMRT:巴士数量增加 司机人手短缺。(omy.sg 21 May 2012)】

“做出决定前 已和工会讨论过”。 即是说工会同意,政府也同意 (政府是公司的大老板),这真是很特别的包容,包容到最后,巴士司机不但没有加薪,反而减薪。难怪,新加坡低薪工友的薪金,过去几十年,都是通过这种包容的包装,压低工资,表面上看起来,政府在做好事呢!事实上,包容的结果是低薪工友吃了大亏。难怪,10年来这群人没有实质加薪,正而如林崇椰所说的是减薪。

后港选民在认清了行动党的包容心后,还要接受行动党的爱心礼物吗?地铁公司这么大,也玩起朝三暮四的游戏,行动党这个幕后老板,不是本事更大,诡计更多吗?小心手中的神圣一票,不要再度因为包容行动党,而失去后港精神后港魂。这个精神这个魂得来不易,一旦失去,就回不了头了。

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...