Skip to main content

Why our NE never turn children into the PAP supporters?

Why our NE (National Education) programs never turn children into the PAP supporters?

July is the busy month for school children. Many schools are involved in the National Day Parade as participants and all schools celebrate National Day with a message from the education minister.

For Primary five school children, it is part of their NE program to attend the National Day Parade rehearsals in person. Transport and food arrangements will be provided to bring them there.

This is the experience all school children have to go through and it has become a growing up program for school children since our independence in 1965.


I read with interest the following 2 articles from the USA:

Do July 4th Parades Turn Kids into Republicans?

All that fireworks-watching, flag-waving and potato salad-eating this weekend could in fact lead to a vote for the Republican party for your child.
And the stats from Harvard back up the claim. When children were exposed at a young age to the Americana fanfare associated with the Fourth of July, they were more likely to vote Republican and make campaign contributions to the party.
A young girl watches a Fourth of July parade in Great Falls, Virginia. And a new study shows she's more likely to become a Republican.
Getty Images


US children who celebrate Independence Day more likely to become Republicans, says Harvard study

A study conducted by Harvard University researchers has concluded that children who attend an Independence Day celebration are more likely to become Republicans as adults.
Even attending a single fireworks display or flag-waving parade, specifically celebrations without rain, can be predictive of a child's future political leanings and voting habits.



PAP must be very angry with our NE programs

Every year, the Ministry of Education spends millions of dollars to educate our children, especially, the contribution of the PAP to our country. A young adult in Singapore would have celebrated at least 10 to 12 National Day celebrations in schools.

How come they are different from the American children? The younger they are, the higher the education they have, they are more likely to vote for the oppositions.

NUS Institute of Policy Study did a post-GE2011 survey and the just released results are quite different from the Harvard study on American children.

The IPS finding as reported is: “More older voters and young people, as well as those with a higher level of socio-economic status, are "pluralists". These are voters who want more diversity in politics. “(new.xin.msn.com)

Republicans would dream to have our NE    

If the USA has our NE programs and every child celebrates Independence Day on the Fourth of July, the Republicans would have gained majority of supporters in the USA.    

Unfortunately, this is not the way to educate children in the USA. It is not compulsory to attend Independence Day celebrations. Perhaps, the Republicans should introduce a bill to make NE a compulsory in the USA and it is good for their future.

Are we tired of NE?

Singapore is going to celebrate National Day again on the Ninth of August this year. It is not easy to get a ticket to attend the celebration parade.  Many people attend the event year after year.  Are they belonged to the same cluster of people? If it is a wide-spread event, then the NE effects should have influenced the voters.

May be we should think of a creative way to engage people to celebrate National Day?  This is especially true for the PAP. They should think very hard how to make NE an asset rather than a liability to them.

If the National Day parade is still organized by the military, being part of their military exercises and operations, it will be really hard to make them think out of the ‘disciplined’ box. 

Comments

  1. As Lysa Hong and Huang Jianli pointed out in their conclusion to 'The Scripting of a National History: Singapore and its pasts' (NUS Press, 2008), NE died before 2006. It bred cynicism and many students labelled it 'propaganda' from the start. In the US, 4th of July is a patriotic event, not a propagandistic one.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting

因为有比较, 才知道做得不够, 才明白什么叫做易通。

  因为有比较, 才知道做得不够, 才明白什么叫做易通。 如果只有一套解决方法,很难看出好坏,方便还是不方便,易通还是不容易通。用新方法代替旧的系统,人们当然会做比较,尤其是科技产品,使用的人很多,一用就马上看到结果。 这是一个竞争的世界,即使一党独大,也要考虑到便民。当人民觉得不方便,不好用,不易通,就会反映,发声,不满。为什么没有预先想到,最可怕的是测试时,已经接到反应,还是不加改善。或许,行动党还抱着“令伯”最大,用者自行解决问题。 易通公交收费系统的整合,似乎缺少一种人文,沟通,反而更加多表现出政府的独断独行。尤其重要的是,如果只有一套系统,我们是看不出问题,做不出好坏的评价。 这其实证明国会里不可以只有一把声音,没有比较,没有进步。

梁文辉可能有点傻, 但却是真的真情流露。