Skip to main content

Moving forward to a right direction?

Moving forward to a right direction?

This is a different July the first. It marks a significant change of how Singapore is moving forward.

First, we see the new journey for Singapore by Chen Show Mao. This in many ways is more important than the next one as the administration of Singapore is in the hand of the government and directly under the ‘checks and balances’ by the people through Parliament.     

Second, we see the right move by President Nathan by not seeking another term.  His decision is good for himself and also for the good of Singapore. A different kind of President will be elected and very likely for the first time in Singapore history, the quality and capability of a Singapore President is considered and recognized as higher than that of a Singapore Prime Minister.

It is worth to reproduce the facebook statement of Chen Show Mao in full. 

“After much thought and consideration, I have decided to retire from active practice as a partner of the Davis Polk law firm with effect from July.  It is quite clear to me that given my new responsibilities as MP I will not be able to continue practicing law the way I have in the last twenty years.  Law is in my blood and no doubt it will be part of my life.  Meanwhile, my retirement from the partnership will afford me more time for my family, to serve constituency and country, and to explore alternative work arrangements.

I wish to thank my partners for what I received over the years: their best efforts to aid my professional success and advancement, and the opportunity to use my best faculties to our common benefit.  The same goes to our colleagues and clients.  I have had many good years with the firm and leave with fond memories and many friendships.

On this new journey for Singapore, to everyone who has in some way extended to me encouragement, support and hope, you have my gratitude for reaffirmation.  In many ways, this is as much our journey as it is my journey: let us forge our way forward for a better Singapore for all Singaporeans.

Right direction and Right Move

Here, we see a top rate international lawyer giving up his usual high paying job for Singapore, especially for opposition politics.  On the other hand, we also see the announcement of President Nathan who is going to retire from his multi-million dollar Presidency when his term of office expires.    

Both are giving up or retiring from their high paying job.  Whose decision is more important and significant to Singapore? One is engaging the people and the other is moving away from the people.

You can find the full statement of President Nathan here:

I note with interest the following from his statement:

“Whether it is in the office of the president or in the executive arm of the government, the country needs people of strong character and vision who resist populist pressures and the temptation to sacrifice the long-term interests of the nation in response to those who merely snipe without having to take responsibility.”

Strong character President and PM?

Is his trying to imply that after September the first, there will be 2 strong character men in charge of Singapore?  And both will resist popular pressures.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...