Skip to main content

The efficient but ineffective PAP



                                          Memory of Deyi 4

The efficient but ineffective PAP

At the Deyi Nomination Centre, you could see the organization efficiency of the PAP and the inefficiency of the oppositions. However, when came to effectiveness, it seemed to be the reverse.

Peter F. Drucker, a 20th century Austrian social scientist and author of many books on organizational management said that businesses should strive for effectiveness in contrast to mere efficiency. A quote from Drucker's book, The Effective Executive, says that "Efficiency is doing things right, effectiveness is doing the right things."

Doing things right

Efficient supporters doing things right
Efficient supporters doing things right

The PAP has an excellent grassroots support and is able to send many people to the nomination centres on the nomination day. They did it in an efficient way, dividing into different GRC, SMC teams and arranging different time for them to march into the nomination  centres.  Days   before the nomination day, the PAP already did the planning asking supports from the PAP branches, NTUC and even RCs or CCCs. 
LKY even said that PA was also part of the PAP.
                                                                       
These people (I don’t like to use the word ‘supporters’ as I believe some may not vote for the PAP eventually) were given some incentives to attend the nomination day event. Transport and food were provided as the PAP could get sponsors easily.

Due to efficient management, these people were disciplined and obedience.  Some could not take the heat and ambulance had to be called. And most of them are not working like housewives, retired persons. Of course, there were some die-hard supporters who took leave.

Doing right things

Effective supporters doing right things
Effective supporters doing right things

On the other side, you could see supporters of the oppositions coming in alone, 2 or 3 or in a group 5 or 6. Although some supporters came in blue, however, most of them wore different colours.  

They could only form part of the school field at Deyi Secondary School. However, when came to shouting for supports. The opposition supporters were united and cheered for RP, SPP and WP candidates.  If you look at the YouTube video, you will know what I mean. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsJtBeQLvgE

Almost all the PAP candidates only looked at their own supporters when they made their speeches.  That included PM Lee. Sometimes, the shouting was so loud that you could not hear the speeches of the PAP candidates. 

While there were many PAP people there, but they were ‘speechless’, “soundless’; there were no cheer leaders; and they did not even look like a united force even though all wore white.  

2 examples of efficiency and effectiveness

You can find many descriptions and examples in modern management books and publications about efficiency and effectiveness. Here are 2 examples:

<<For example 1, think of a company that was successfully making buggy whips as automobiles became the mode of transportation. Assume that the processes used to make buggy whips were perfect. The relationships of internal and external suppliers and customers were perfect. The suppliers and customers teamed together to make perfect buggy whips. The buggy whips were delivered on or ahead of schedule at the lowest possible cost. This company was very efficient. However, the company and its strategists were not very effective. The company was doing the wrong things efficiently. If they had been effective, they would have anticipated the impending changes and gotten into a different market.

Let's consider a surgery example 2. A surgeon is very skilled, perhaps the best in the country. The impending job is to operate on the patient's left knee. However, the surgeon doesn't perform all the steps of the process leading up to the surgery. Someone else marks the right knee for surgery. However skilled this surgeon is, however fast he performs the surgery (i.e., however efficient he is), this process will not be effective. When the patient awakens from the surgery, he will not be a happy camper. And what about the HMO? Who will pay for a surgery performed on the wrong knee? >>



If you link the 2 examples to the PAP

Example 1:

The buggy whips (like the PAP people) were delivered on or ahead of schedule at the lowest possible cost. (It might be no cost at all as they are many willing sponsors). This company (like the PAP) was very efficient.

However, the company (like the PAP) and its strategists were not very effective. The company (like the PAP) was doing the wrong things efficiently. If they (the PAP) had been effective, they would have anticipated the impending changes (expectation, desires of Singapore voters) and gotten into a different market.

Example 2

Someone else (like the PAP CEC) marks the right knee (wrong strategies) for surgery. However skilled this surgeon is (the powerful PAP), however fast he performs (getting people to nomination centres) the surgery (i.e., however efficient he is), this process will not be effective. When the patient awakens from the surgery, he will not be a happy camper. (When the Singapore voters awake, they are very angry)

Why rally turnouts were so different?

The first example is about manufacturing - hardware and the second is talking about care – software (hearts).

There is a limit to the PAP’s efficiency.  When you need a participation of 10,000, 20,000 or 100,000 people, you need effectiveness.  There are common values or meanings for people to participate in a mass rally.  Just like a football match, you could see the difference between Singapore lion vs. Malaysia tiger and the S-league matches.  Why the former could get a big turnout?

There was no problem for the PAP to get 1,000, 2,000 or even 5,000 to their rallies.  But there is a limit on hardware (sponsored logistics) and software (willingness to come).  

If you consider Jasmine revolution, people who stood against the authority were equipped with poor weapons or no weapons at all.  But how come an inefficient group of people could become an effective force to overthrow the establishments? 

Any implication for PE2011

Singapore voters expect a contest for the coming PE.  If we do have the opportunity to vote, candidate(s) who stand against the powerful Tony Tan may have to take lessons from the GE2011 and turns the inefficient disadvantage to an effective emotional campaign
 
Among the potential candidates, Tony Tan has the best support and most efficient campaign machinery, but whether he also has the effective software to attract voters and win their hearts or not, we will have to wait and see.  He has already begun in his soft approach by caring for a child, giving speeches, lunching with bloggers and even attending religion event.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting

因为有比较, 才知道做得不够, 才明白什么叫做易通。

  因为有比较, 才知道做得不够, 才明白什么叫做易通。 如果只有一套解决方法,很难看出好坏,方便还是不方便,易通还是不容易通。用新方法代替旧的系统,人们当然会做比较,尤其是科技产品,使用的人很多,一用就马上看到结果。 这是一个竞争的世界,即使一党独大,也要考虑到便民。当人民觉得不方便,不好用,不易通,就会反映,发声,不满。为什么没有预先想到,最可怕的是测试时,已经接到反应,还是不加改善。或许,行动党还抱着“令伯”最大,用者自行解决问题。 易通公交收费系统的整合,似乎缺少一种人文,沟通,反而更加多表现出政府的独断独行。尤其重要的是,如果只有一套系统,我们是看不出问题,做不出好坏的评价。 这其实证明国会里不可以只有一把声音,没有比较,没有进步。

梁文辉可能有点傻, 但却是真的真情流露。