Skip to main content

Don’t judge a person by his language ability


Memory of Deyi 2                                            


Don’t judge a person by his language ability


“Of course, my English is not as good as MM Lee’s. But, his Chinese is definitely not better than mine. “ - Low Thia Khiang


I was at the Deyi nomination centre to show support to the oppositions. And I was glad that I had witnessed a very important event and a historical  moment in Singapore history. There were two sitting opposition MPs venturing out of SMC to contest in GRC. And there was a possibility that Singapore would end with no elected opposition MP in the House. The result as shown in GE 2011 is now a history - a sweet memory.

While taking photos, I noticed a not so perfect (left) ear of Low Thia Khiang.   I though this was born like this only until I read the posting of ‘overcoming the deafening silence’ http://enquirer.sg/2009/01/19/overcoming-the-deafening-silence/

Low Thia Khiang at the nomination centre

Low injured his ear during his NS as disclosed in the post. In fact, it was quite common for NS men to get ear injuries in the earlier years of National Service as the protection was not as good as today. 

Another President’s scholar was out and down

George Yeo is the second President’s scholar, after the defeat of Mah Bow Tan in Potong Pasir, to be defeated in a general election. 

The success of WP team in Aljunied is of course a team work but without Low, there is no guarantee that WP would win the race so handsomely with certainty. A Chinese educated Low led a team of underdogs beat the English elites led by a President’s scholar in Singapore.  Is this a double defeat for the PAP? A common man poor in English and a non scholar beat an elite scholar who has good command of English.

Hearts are not won by good English

No wonder Lee Kuan Yew got so angry. How can a third-class (Nanyang) university graduate, likes Low, beat a President’s and SAF scholar, likes George Yeo, who graduated from Cambridge and Harvard? 

People, who know about the history of Chinese education and Nantah in Singapore, will think this is a mission impossible.  With the hard work of Low, quietly serving in Hougang SMC for 20 years, he finally breaks a GRC and makes history in Singapore.  

The government and the PAP have spent millions of dollars training all these elites to take over the running of the country and now suddenly they are not sure of wining in the election. Are tax payers money well spent? Or are the PAP training paper generals for the election?

Just like Chiam See Tong said he got only 5 ‘O’ levels but he defeated a President scholar in Potong Pasir.  More are to be expected in the coming election.

PAP supporters marching out of Deyi Nomination Centre 

A re-run for coming PE?

What’s wrong in Singapore?  The best educated elites from the PAP cannot win the hearts of the people. And people who spoke broken English or less perfect English won the race.

Will there be a repeat in the coming presidential election?  Tan Kin Lian who speaks less perfect English is closer to the people and beat Tony Tan who is proficiency in the English language but keeps himself a distance away from the common men and women. 

Go beyond English first

If you look around our local entrepreneurs, especially those older generations, and you will realize how good their English are. They may not speak good English but they are intelligent, smart and they employ many graduates, some even elites or at least from elite schools.

With the passing of Lee Kuan Yew’s era, we really need to re-look our English first policy.  In markets like China, South East Asia, and even India, the knowledge of local language and culture is far more important than the good English that our education system claimed to produce.

Indeed, we are doing in out universities and research institutes already.

English first or research first

Many have complained the English standard of our foreign imported lecturers, professors and researchers in our local universities.

The PAP is quite double standard in this aspect.  When they want high quality researchers, they are not so concern about their English proficiency. They want local universities to have quality research papers published in international journals or magazines.

By doing so, they are quite flexible. The English first approach can now change to research first.  Who know, in the near future, it can be baby first, foreign first or money first (oh, they have been doing so already)?   

Will they one day dare to acknowledge People First?  However, it is not decided by the PAP but by the People Power of Singaporeans.  

Comments

  1. I don't understand what point you are trying to make.

    Most people can see and hear that Low Thia Kiang's first language is Chinese. So his English is not as good as his Chinese, but his Chinese is of a high standard. I respect him for that.

    The problem with most (Chinese) Singaporeans is that they have a low standard in both languages, English and Chinese.

    When I look at Low Thia Kiang, I don't think '3rd class honours from Nantah' as you have described. To me, he actually exemplifies the Confucian gentleman, jun1 zi3.

    I also don't think it is as simple as 'WP underdogs' vs 'PAP elites'. After all, Chen Show Mao on paper looks exactly like a PAP elite. And if you want to say Low beat Yeo, you might as well say Chen Show Mao beat George Yeo. So Stanford/Oxford beat Cambridge/Harvard. That's completely illogical.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...