Skip to main content

Back to Square One? Singapore or the PAP

Back to Square One?  Singapore or the PAP

After more than 2 months of listening, there are signs that Singapore or the PAP is moving back to the origin, i.e. back to square one. 

In the past weeks, news about transport, housing, education, staff support, CPF, economy and political development are indicating the movements of back to the past.  The first one is back to 1965. 


Back to 1965

As a reminder to Singaporeans about the contribution of the PAP, a movie is to be produced based on the story of Singapore independence.

I wonder who will be the lucky actor to do the crying for Singapore.  This will be a re-education program for Singaporeans, especially for the young, new citizens and PRs.  This is just another expected and continued campaign.

<Singapore director to produce movie on country's independence>

[Homerun Asia, which produces the movie, said on its website that the movie, 1965, is based on Lee Kuan Yew's struggle for the independence of Singapore.
"1965 is a political thriller focused on 90 tumultuous days in the year 1965, when racial and ideological differences saw violent clashes on the streets of Singapore, while political intrigue and conspiracy led to power struggles in the City Hall," it said.]
(news.xinhuanet.com, 15 Jul 11)


HDB – may be a positive back to square one

A review or suspension of DBSS shows the government is under pressure to do some things to solve the housing problem – possible with a lower selling price.  

However, the review or the ‘back to square one’ approach will not change HDB’s policy of profit making.  Otherwise, HDB will not be able to provide better and affordable housing. This mindset is reflected in the public transport policy (see below).    

[Responding to media queries, MND said the Housing & Development Board (HDB) would not proceed with the sale of a Bendemeer Road site which was scheduled for launch in the first half of this year.

MND has reiterated it would review the need for DBSS, following Minister for National Development Khaw Boon Wan's comments on his Facebook fan page that he had suspended future land sales under the scheme on Sunday. ]
(CNA, 4 Jul 11)


Transport – Profit making is still the key

The government still wants to link productivity and profit in the transport sector. They have not changed their position that transport companies must make profit so that they can provide good services (?). If they don’t make money the situation will be worst.

[Both SBS Transit and SMRT have submitted their proposals to the Public Transport Council (PTC) to raise fares. This has generated some responses, including a suggestion for our public transport system to be nationalised.
While this might seem like a very attractive idea, in reality, it has serious downsides, chief amongst which commuters and taxpayers (yes, even those who don't take public transport) are likely to end up paying more, and possibly, for a poorer level of service over time.]
(Transport Minister Lui Tuck Yew's Facebook)

Education – back to the basic

What actually are we teaching our children since independence? Values, competencies and thinking all these are supposed to be the basic and fundamentals of education. 

A reminder and re-emphasis of these 3 elements seems to suggest we did not educate and teach our children in a proper way in the past.  Getting parents involved is also not a new thing.

[Education Minister Heng Swee Keat says his ministry will be focusing on three outcomes: Values, social and emotional competencies, as well as new skills in thinking such as being more globally aware.

"I'm looking at how we can better support our school leaders, our teachers in delivering this education and how we can also bring in parents as part of this very important process," he said yesterday. ]
(Today, 17 Jul 11)


CPF – no hasty changes

Do not expect changes in CPF in the short term. For retirement, medical, contributions, withdrawal, all will remain unchanged.  If the economy turns unfavorable, the changes will come but not for the better. 

<No hasty changes to CPF for older workers>

["Let's not make changes in haste. Let's study this carefully, consult employers, consult the unions, find out the realities on the ground. And do the right thing for our older workers. That's what we're concerned about," said Mr Tharman, who spoke on the sidelines of a community event.]
 (Toady, 17 Jul 11)

Staff support to 2 ex-PMs – back to not listening

Whether you like it or not, the government is providing staff support to the 2 ex-PMs. They don’t even bother to consult you whether you agree or not agree.

<PM to offer staff to ex-MM and Emeritus SM>
[Ex-Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew and Emeritus Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong will each be provided with a Special Assistant and one Press Secretary part-time, plus one secretary and two full-time clerical officers.
A press statement from the Prime Minister's Office (PMO), said the Prime Minister has decided to provide the two elder statesmen with the staff because of their continued vital contributions to Singapore.]
(AsiaOne, 13 Jul 11)


Economy – back to financial crisis?

There are uncertainties in the world economy. All major industrial countries are showing signs of weakness. We are not exception as we depend on them for our export.  

A back to financial crisis is possible.  The government is preparing and individuals should do the same. As usual, we don’t have the full picture of what the government is doing and preparing.

[Singaporeans should brace themselves for the impact of a sluggish global economy in the coming months, said Deputy Prime Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam yesterday.  
But the fundamentals of the local economy are still good and a major global crisis like the one in 2008 is unlikely to happen, he added. ]
(ST 17 Jul 11)


Politics – back to square one for PE2011

We cannot rule out at the end of day, there is only one certificate of eligibility issued to Dr. Tony Tan.

Yes. It is a walkover.

This will be the greatest ‘back to square one’ for political development in Singapore after the GE2011!

Comments

  1. Read the oracle:http://thetwophilo.wordpress.com/

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting

因为有比较, 才知道做得不够, 才明白什么叫做易通。

  因为有比较, 才知道做得不够, 才明白什么叫做易通。 如果只有一套解决方法,很难看出好坏,方便还是不方便,易通还是不容易通。用新方法代替旧的系统,人们当然会做比较,尤其是科技产品,使用的人很多,一用就马上看到结果。 这是一个竞争的世界,即使一党独大,也要考虑到便民。当人民觉得不方便,不好用,不易通,就会反映,发声,不满。为什么没有预先想到,最可怕的是测试时,已经接到反应,还是不加改善。或许,行动党还抱着“令伯”最大,用者自行解决问题。 易通公交收费系统的整合,似乎缺少一种人文,沟通,反而更加多表现出政府的独断独行。尤其重要的是,如果只有一套系统,我们是看不出问题,做不出好坏的评价。 这其实证明国会里不可以只有一把声音,没有比较,没有进步。

梁文辉可能有点傻, 但却是真的真情流露。