Skip to main content

So Rich yet So Poor



Singapore as a country is very rich so do residents staying in Singapore, regardless of their nationality.  This is how Gross Domestic Products are measured and with population of 5 million over, our economy is now richer than our closer competitor, Hong Kong which has more than 7 million people.

Look at the following headline, how wonderful it is:

 

Singapore's GDP set to overtake Hong Kong's this year: Merrill Lynch

http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2011-05-27/news/29589955_1_singapore-s-gdp-hong-kong-merrill-lynch

Our land is smaller, our population is smaller and yet we are richer.  This in the past, especially before GE2011, is what the People’s Action Party (PAP) is championing for.  We have made it. We have achieved it and have beaten Hong Kong handsomely.  So, shall call for a celebration?  Yes, in the past, before 7 May 2011, the PAP will show off and the media will highlight it as another greater achievement for the government.

As what Dr. Lim Wee Kiak’s thinking and joking about our ministerial pay, Singaporeans can now travel around the world and asking other people how much is their GDP and looking down almost all of them, including Hong Kong people, most Europeans because their per capita GDP is much smaller than us.     

But, wait a moment… There is another side of the story and this are the real reasons why the PAP did badly in GE2011.

We are really not that rich, especially for the lower bottom of the residents.  Excluding foreigner labour (maids and workers), these poor residents are true blue Singapore citizens.  They can’t even own a home or dying at home without notice.

Here are 2 pieces of the sad news:

Khaw: Tens of thousands of rental flats needed

http://www.straitstimes.com/BreakingNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_674083.html

and

 

About 6 elderly S'poreans die alone each month

http://www.straitstimes.com/BreakingNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_674141.html


Are we heading even more of the good and bad news? Are we moving towards even a greater social divide, for those have and haven’t?   No wonder our Gini index is getting into a dangerous level.  We will experience and expect to see more rich getting richer and more poor become poorer.

The government is listening as what PM Lee told Singaporeans when he begins his new term as Primer Minister.  PM Lee is asking for a review on the ministerial pay.   What can expect? Can a lower paying Minister solve the housing problem and care more for the poor, sick and old?      

It is too early to tell.  Let’s wait and see. 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...
275 comments
Read more

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...
65 comments
Read more

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...
50 comments
Read more