Skip to main content

千万千万不要投废票,这么做就是上了行动党的当


千万千万不要投废票,这么做就是上了行动党的当


由于选情吃紧,行动党在阿裕尼集选区,不但打出悲情牌,恐吓牌,还打出两难牌,试图迷惑选民,鼓励选民投废票,这种不符合民主精神的做法,却在主流媒体,大事宣传下,好像真的有两难这回事。

如果,相信行动党的说法,正如主流媒体所宣传的那样,那么,阿裕尼选民可真正是上了行动党的当,中了行动党所编制的谎言的当。行动党就是不要选民投票给工人党,多投一张废票,工人党就少一张支持票。对工人党的选情非常非常的不利。

这要从选区划分后谈起。2006年,工人党在阿裕尼只得43%的票。而行动党56%的票。这是选区划分前的基本盘。但是,我们大家都知道,选区划分后,部分支持工人党的票源区,去了宏茂桥。而新划分过来的部分选区则来自马林百列。这么一来一往,工人党基本盘就下降到40%,而行动党则上升到60%.

工人党要获得胜选,就要拉拢最少10%的行动党的选票。这10%选票,就要从行动党的浮动支持者手中得来。这些选民心里支持国会里要有反对党来制衡行动党,但是,如果反对党素质不高,他们是绝对不会支持反对党的。但是,这次工人党的超级A队来了阿裕尼,这就使到他们心动,或许,可以考虑投工人党一票。

当这些选民,正在犹豫怎么投这张票时,行动党就对他们进行思想工作。这时,李资政就出来放风声,说你们一定会后悔的。然后,又放出一些假风声,什么工人党就是要夺权执政,试问,一个竞选23个议席的工人党,如何在一个有87个议席的国会中取得执政地位。总之,假风声炒久了,就会变成好像真的一样。

行动党就是要达到这个目的,选民一旦迷惑,不知所措时,就会两边都投,或两边都不投。有些选民,根本就不去投票。这对基本盘处于不利地位的工人党,就无法取得更多的票。无法取得更多的票,就意味着,工人党就会面对败选的命运。

还记得1987年的友诺士集选区吗?工人党只是少了一千多张票。如果,行动党能够把废票的张数,增加到一千多张,那么,工人党的胜选机会就失掉了。

阿裕尼的选民们,千万千万要记得不要投废票。而一定要把票投给工人党。这样一来,工人党才有机会成功突破一个集选区。在国会发出制衡的声音。

行动党的一贯手法和手段,就是恐吓,利诱,迷惑,假消息乱播发,抹黑,而主流媒体就配合演出,你要我报道两难,夺权的消息,我就在头版或标题上大事报道,李资政说什么,就报什么,反正他说的是金玉良言,选民不是害怕,就是盲从。

这对没有上网,只依赖主流媒体的读者和观从来说,是一个非常有利的宣传工具,而且,每次大选都对老一辈的人起着非常大的作用。反正,只要赢工人党一张票,就是赢。

工人党这次在阿裕尼做出生死决战,失败了,工人党将会沉沦下去。但是,行动党只不过失掉两个部长,老树依旧盘根,根本不会倒下。如果你做国家未来的风险分析,你要一颗刚冒出的新芽枯萎掉,还是继续让一棵老树一手遮天。分担风险才是上策。投工人党一票,让新芽快快长大。


不论,阿裕尼集选区的战果如何,阿裕尼和全新加坡选民一定会对结果痛哭一番。如果,工人党败选,我们痛哭一支这么好的团队都失败,那么,反对党还有希望吗?我们什么时候,才可以再组织另一支超级A队。

如果,工人党胜出,我们则会发出胜利的哭声。终于,新加坡选民认可国会里,需要一股制衡的力量。这是胜利的哭声,当然,也加上胜利的欢笑声。

新加坡选民,尤其是阿裕尼的选民们,我们希望,我们期待胜利欢呼声,已经超过50年了。难道,还要再等50年吗?胜利就在你们手中,敢敢投工人党一票,创造历史新篇章。

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...