Skip to main content

冷静日,思考什么? 比较过去五年和未来五年,有必要改变吗?


日,思考什 比较过去五年和未来五年,有必要改变吗?

五年,如果行党在国会仍然有受到制衡,那是一个怎么样的新加坡?行党政府又将怎么对

好好地想一想,和家人朋友讨论一下,看看下面的说法对不对,然后,才决定投下神圣的一票:

·       在国会里,党的政策,不需要详细辩论,便能易地通。行党的后座议员,只头赞成,不会为你据理力。好多是上市公司董事,多才多议员的薪金,只不收入的一部分。你有听到新旧行动党候选人说,他们会摆脱行动党的思维,真正的为人民服务吗?没有。

·       的薪金也要努力再高峰。深怕有个国家的领导,有样学样,赶上我们世界第一的标准。部长要努力拼经济,最好能年年像2010年一样,这么一来,每年就有八个月的花红。你在群从大会上,有听到行动党说要检讨部长薪金吗?没有。

·       次大这么辛苦。下次,会进一步完善选举制度,那些高风险选区将会绝迹。取代的是新的,奇怪的选区组合。新的选区划分,次大,更加具有意。行动党一再强调非选区议员和官委议员的好处,所以,五年后,他们会再度变更选举制度,来达到一党独大的目的。他们会恢复全部都是单选区的过去吗?肯定不会。

·       人口会继续新加坡。因,新加坡人不愿做些工作。把外人引进来经济有好制造更多就会给新加坡人。但是,不要提工的上也不要提最低工资。你们劳动成果是要跟外比的。你没有力想拿什高薪,有工作给你就要地了。外劳政策会改变吗?不会,可能连修改都不会,因为,总理今天说,星期六的大选,行动党有好成绩?既然有好成绩,连阿裕尼都不会输,这样还有什么好怕的. 肯定不会改变。

·       的痛苦,人上会为你,也绝对没人再向你说声道歉。这种场面是五年难得一见的。所以,没钱的更加没钱,有的更加有没钱的最好到新山去,里是有人的天堂,不是没钱人的家。行动党口口声声说,新加坡人是负担的起医药费的,因次,医药政策也不会改变。

·       当然,组屋的售价也是人人负担的起的。大政策是不会改变的。为什么要改变售卖组屋赚大钱这种大生意。政府收入多,部长薪金也可以上调,还可以拿到国外做投资,这样的政策,是不可能改变的。

·       但是,不要问组屋成本怎么计算,外汇有多少,淡马锡,政府投资公司的细节,行动党不会告诉你,你要猜,就去猜个够?行动党不会回答你。新加坡不需要这样的透明度。你需要知道,因为,行动党政府有世界上最好的人才打理这些钱。

·       意在育上做大的改。中,小的班数还是和以前一多。但是,支,然是最大的支。地铁公交会增加设施,但是,外来人口会继续增加,所以,问题还是一样。行动党不会为此而改变。

总之,过去五年你面对的问题,和将来五年的问题,还是一样。行动党过去五年怎么解决问题,未来五年也用同样的方法解决同样的问题。这就是没有反对党在国会制衡的结果。

如果,你对行动党过去五年的表现满意,不需要改变,那么,你很可能,再度投行动党一票。如果,你对一党独大,做事不和人民商量,以经济为前提,而希望行动党改变作风,那么,请投反对党一票。只有反对党才能在国会里,为人民据理力争,逼行动党为人民流泪,向人民说道歉,改变政策,以人民的利益做事。

为了未来五年有个更加贴心的政府,更加关心民意的行动党,选民在57 日,要勇敢的投反对党一票。

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...