Skip to main content

僵硬、死板的接班人制度把行动党引向死胡同

2015 PAP Strategy 战略 20 --  虚伪的接班人制度



2015年的新加坡大选,独立后出生的选民将超过选民总数的一半以上。面对这种新的局面,行动党依然虚伪的推出接班人制度做号召,这能吸引年轻选民的共鸣吗?

行动党昨天由总理李显龙亲自宣布这次大选的竞选宣言和主题:你我同心,为国为民



警方还特意为这场行动党宣言的造势大会而封路。行动党仍然还要摆出强势的姿态。在大选的紧要关头,依然故我,自我的感觉真好。 选民看在眼里,会是怎么一种感觉?大家心里都有一把尺,行动党知道吗?


每一次大选,行动党都要提出接班人的问题。从第一代到现在进入第四代了。一代比一代进步吗?提出接班人的问题无非就是要继续维持政权,继续领高薪,而不是从人民的利益出发。选民感觉这是一个与他们脱节的政党,不是以新加坡人出发,更加不是从年轻人的立场看问题。

反观工人党,我们就看出这个大不同。工人党这次的竞选宣言和口号:掌握民权,把握将来。都是交给年轻的党员,独立后的出生年轻一代去进行、筹划。一位可爱的记者还问,这是不是表示工人党,不重视这次的竞选宣言。

也,目的真好相反。

工人党就是要和年轻人站在一起,现在连小孩子,都早熟到喜欢工人党,而把行动党当成一个目标。这是一位小学生的画作。可惜,这幅画结果只得了一个C。


行动党机械式接班人制度

搞了50多年,行动党还是脱离不了这个所谓的接班人制度。这个僵硬,死板,又机械式的制度,将令行动党走入一个死胡同。

你想一想,行动党会让孙学玲,陈惠玲,钟丽慧,陈有明,陈佩玲加入2015年大选宣言的工作吗?他们只有听的份。

就算是第四代接班人里的候选人,如前三军总长黄志明,前高级公务员徐芳达,前高级警官杨益财等人,行动党会放心让他们参与行动党2015竞选宣言的工作和口号的设计吗?

答案很明显,在行动党机械式的制度下,新的候选人,只是旗子,重要的候选人,还要放在安全的集选区里,这就造成了新加坡选举制度的怪现象:老兵前线打战,新兵后面享受。当然,新兵也不可能参与选战的策划,设计,更加谈不上参与宣言思考和筹划。更更加不可能出席记者会,为行动党宣读竞选宣言和大喊口号。

在这一点上,工人党就是和行动党不同。工人党年轻和新候选人,积极的参与宣言的思考,起草,设计工作。他们走到台前,勇敢向新加坡选民,说明工人党的宣言内容和解释口号的意义。

行动党会放心让行动党新人做这样重大的决定吗?

而工人党却做到这一点。工人党新人是为自己的理想而打拼,天下是打出来的。不是坐享其成。


行动党会放心让行动党新人做这样重大的决定吗?大家都知道,党的宣言,不是一件开玩笑的事情,万一搞不好, 会直接影响选情,党的声誉。行动党是不可能这么轻易的把这么重大的事情,让新人去做。

工人党不但让新人起草宣言,还要让他们直接面对选民,去宣传他们的理念,他们的理想,年轻人的思维。工人党要他们去说服选民,如果攻下集选区,就去执行他们的理想。

这才是接班人的正确做法。年轻人为自己的理想打拼,新加坡才有希望。行动党的那套做法,为新人安排后路,让他们顺利中选,这种做法,只有把行动党引入一个死胡同,难怪,新加坡人一直批评行动党的候选人是纸上将军。他们不需要为理想而奋斗,只会坐享其成。

工人党大胆启用新人,行动党却故步自封。工人党新人需要打天下,宣传自己的理想。而行动党新人,跟在僵硬的接班人制度下,无法施展自己的才华,他们甚至连和选民直接见面,说明自己理念的勇气都没有。

作为选民,你会选谁?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...