Skip to main content

马谡失街亭,陈川仁失守马林百列。

2015 PAP Strategy 战略 8


【吴作栋是资产还是负资产?陈川仁会不会是另一个杨荣文将军?杨荣文被认为智勇双全,最后还是像关羽那样兵败沙场,动摇了整个行动党的军心。】



wp  1 - Copy.png

国会里有五位人民行动党的将军,水军都督吕德耀已经自废武功,不再参加来临的大选。去了一位海军将领,新来一位空军将领,兼任三军总长,这是否能加强行动党围堵工人党的防线呢?

吕德耀的离去和他的集选区被废除掉,事实上是要加强防线,以防万一马林百列集选区失守,还有第二道防线阻挡住工人党的西进计划。旧的集选区被废除,新的惹兰勿刹集选区,就是进行军事重组,加强防卫,很可能还会进行空袭?投弹,空投宣传品到工人党的选区。

另外,除了围堵工作外,选区划分后,还划出几个单选区,在工人党的势力范围搞地下活动,进行颠覆活动,小骚动等等。企图分散工人党的军心,动摇工人党的行军运输工作。

行动党能否成功把工人党围堵在阿裕尼集选区?

工人党地盘的北部,盘踞着陆军出身的李总理,他当然能够顺便的动用全国的军力来做围堵工作。虽然外号阿斗,但是出身“汉室”,属于正统的“军二代”。在东北部,海军出身的副总理张志贤,也可以动用全国的军力来从事,地基工程,增加组屋,变化人口结构来强化围堵工作。外号睡仙的他,还在鼓吹国会已经确保有9个反对党议员,不需要再增加反对党人数了,可见这位将军,还在睡觉,他真的以为睡觉都可以中选,那是他命好,遇到一支‘只要参选,不要胜选’的杂牌军。

即使东海岸集选区失守,被工人党拿下,工人党还是冲不出包围圈。因为,行动党在马林百列还有一位将军在那里驻守。他就是陆军出身的陈川仁。除了他,行动党还派了一位高级军事顾问给他。这就是新加坡第二任总理吴作栋。吴作栋到底是毒药还是帮助陈川仁将军,那就见仁见智了。行动党当然认为是助力,认真想一想未必。

暂时来说,工人党在向北和东都无法突破的情形下,只有向马林百列进军。拿下马林百列集选区,就能找到一条前往西方取经的路。再用迂回的手法,从义顺集选区往下,反包围宏茂桥集选区,这是秦始皇灭掉齐国的方法,不用费什么力气,齐国就自动投降了。这是后话,现在言之过早。

现在的问题是,马林百列是不是街亭?而陈川仁是不是马谡?《三国演义》说,诸葛亮很不放心让马谡去守街亭,还给他派遣一位有军事经历的副将王平共同守街亭。马谡平时给诸葛亮出策,还算可以,但是确实没有实战经历。这是诸葛亮非常担心的事,如果不是马谡立下军令,把个人和全家做赌注,诸葛亮是不会让他去守街亭的。与此同时,在诸葛亮手下,虽然有其他将军,但是,似乎没有人愿意负起这个重要的责任。这和现在的行动党有些相似,派谁出战工人党的选区,是一个大问题,随时都有可能失掉几员大将。

2011年陈川仁当选后出任人力部长,开始时,网民对他的印象还好,最少比另外一位陈将军好。但是,他的确无法胜任人力部的工作,在大选前的内阁改组后,他就被调任到比较安全的部门工作。在他调任人力部长的期间,出了两件比吕德耀还要严重的事件:巴士工潮和小印度骚动。陈川仁真的能够守住马林百列吗?

诸葛亮的北伐计划就是要守住街亭,这样一来,军队的粮食供应就不会出现问题。他想借着这个机会收拾魏国,统一天下。

果然。正如诸葛亮所担心的事发生了。马谡的纸上谈兵,让整个北伐计划失败,而诸葛亮终其一生,也没有办法完成恢复汉室的工作。行动党的神算李光耀已经走了,收拾阿裕尼的工作已经变成一个不可能的任务。而马林百列一旦失去,也就表示行动党将会加速败退。

对于工人党来说,打下马林百列集选区,不但能够扩大版图,在整个新加坡东部,将形成一股强大的力量。

突破阿裕尼是一个分水岭,突破马林百列更加是一个战术上更高的分水岭。这对形成国会的两党制打下一支强心针。

这或许是工人党,不让步而必须坚持攻打马林百列集选区的原因。

我们预祝,工人党成功!让我们大家一起协助工人党拿下马林百列集选区。

马谡失街亭的故事,可以在以下的录像中看到。


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...