Skip to main content

选择性抹黑和骄傲的工人党。

2015 PAP Strategy 战略 16 -- 抹黑



行动党公开的通过选举局,提醒政党不要进行负面的选战。但是,行动党从来没有提醒自己,不要抹黑反对党,尤其是选择性的抹黑反对党。

最新的一则抹黑,就是要为行动党收复失地榜鹅东单选区的张有福发出的。他说工人党市镇会面对亏损。我们想一想,工人党市镇会不是企业,也没有像行动党的市镇会那样投资危险的债券,亏损从何说起?亏损的源头就是政府不发津贴给工人党市镇会。


市镇会亏损 为居民不值

张有福谈榜鹅东:市镇会亏损 为居民不值   wanbao.com.sg.png
晚报 8月25日


原来他说的是财政出现赤字。他还为榜鹅东的选民不值。绕了一个大圈,原来他说的是政府的津贴。政府的津贴一来,赤字就会变黑。这不是欺骗选民的手法吗?他明明知道,所谓的赤字,亏损是和政府津贴挂钩的。


国家发展部如果把7百多万元的津贴拨给工人党市镇会,赤字就会变成黑字,就是这么简单。张有福为了抹黑,为了迷惑选民,就转了一个圈,说他将为民请命,把津贴争取回来。我已经在上一篇博文做了相同的解释了,现在附上有关的说明:WP town.jpg
张有福说的为民请命,说穿了,就是认为行动党会继续做政府,只要人民选择行动党,钱和津贴就自然而然的来了。这种做法,就像把赈灾的钱收起来,把津贴收起来,威胁选民投行动党一票。任何做法,都有它的反面,行动党很幼稚的认为,选民会被迷惑,会被吓倒。它根本没有想到,选民会更加不满行动党的所作所为。


但是,行动党并不是对每个反对党都进行抹黑工作的。行动党所谓抹黑策略,只是针对具有威胁性的反对党。


***
吴作栋虽然不像张有福那样,公开的进行抹黑。作为一个前总理,他有一定的高度。他不方便抹黑,只能说工人党骄傲。对于他来说,工人党的傲气可以和他的40年政绩,对马林百列选区的贡献相比吗?他认为工人党到马林百列,其实是不自量力,选民会这么轻易相信工人党的‘掌握民权,把握未来’吗?他的意思是工人党虽然比团结党来得强,他们可以来试一试,但是要取得突破,免谈。


吴作栋其实是一个很大的负资产他自我感觉良好,还拿出政绩来跟人比。新加坡走到今天这个地步,2011年大选的问题无法解决,拖到2015年,人口,组屋,就业,低薪工友,等等问题,还是无法解决。这些难道跟他没有关系吗?


下面这一篇博文,我有比较多的解释:

Chok Tong is a liability, not an asset. Plus the Aljunied Effect in Marine Parade.

http://pijitailai.blogspot.sg/2015/08/chok-tong-is-liability-not-asset-plus.html


他还形容反对党很像游牧民族,随意的到不同的选区竞选。他忘记了选区划分,忘记了行动党可以随便的增加,减少集选区和集选区的人数。他像不像占了便宜还说风凉话的小人。


或许很少人还记得,1988的大选,行动党政府和主流媒体的目的就是要让吴作栋(负责策划领导)赢得漂漂亮亮,以便为他接任总理一职打下好基础。为了让他大赢,还故意设计了集选区制度,继续一党独大下去。吴作栋也配合演出,过后就制造了一场所谓接班人的秀。

当我们回想新加坡的民主制度,选民掌握民权的机会,把握未来的决定,是不是都和吴作栋有关。因为他,我们的民主和民权开了倒车。在吴作栋出任总理后,他到底有没有真正的考虑到新加坡的未来(瑞士的生活),还是只是考虑他自己和行动党的未来。

想到吴作栋过去的‘丰功伟绩’,马林百列选民可要认真的想一想,评估一下吴作栋的功劳与过错。他真的如同他所说的政绩辉煌吗?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...