Skip to main content

No walk-over, Many Independents and the RM 5-million question.


This was the picture of the nomination day for the Malaysia’s 13th General Election on 20 April 2013.  Except walk-over, Singapore’s GE in 2016 is unlikely to see many independents and the 5-million question.

In Singapore, more political parties, big and small, will send their members to contest in GE2016. So, walk-over will also be a history in Singapore too.

The Malaysian general elections only manage to have no walk-over for the first time this year, a history since 1950s. Again, Malaysian oppositions are ahead of us in first denying the ruling party two-thirds majority in 2008 and now walk-over. However, there are many independents, many small parties and many multi-corner contests, one as many as 7-concerned fight. Why? Has this got to do with the 5-million question?

So, what is the 5-million question? 
[To curb defections that have been haunting the party post the 2008 general election, PKR has made it compulsory for all its candidates, at both parliamentary and state levels, to compensate the party with RM5 million should they jump to another once elected.
"After receiving the appointment letter, if any candidate withdraws before nomination (day) or jumps ship (after they have been elected), they have to compensate RM5 million to the party. (Therefore,) they have to sign an Akujanji letter," said PKR deputy secretary-general Steven Choong.]http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/227339

Oh! there are political frogs that see the opportunity and financial gain of jumping ship.  And the price to pay is 5 million ringgits. Is this the indicative price for buying over a Member of Parliament or state assembly representative? It is not bad for an investment of an election deposit of RM10000 (federal) or RM 5000 (state).  If you play the cards well and the luck is with you, you may strike a big sweep.

Who know even the deposit you may be able to find a sponsor as investor?  The investment return is huge if the indicative price of RM 5 million is correct.  Alternatively, the investment of RM 10000 or 5000 is small if you can deny the main opponents getting more votes.

Is RM 5 million a big sum of money in Malaysia?  Yes and no, depending on your background.  For the award of running the country again, what is the problem of investing RM 50 or even 100 million to buy over 10 or 20 MPs if they are for sell?

So, this 5-million question from PKR as deterrence may not look as effective as it is. When money can be used to make political gains, the situation becomes very complicated.

It is better we come back to the fundamental: political commitment and conviction. Believe in what you are fighting for not because of the money.

Singapore way
Otherwise, you have to do it the Singapore way: No more a party member, no more a MP. You participate in the election in the name of your political party. If you are no more a party member either sacked by the party or resigned from the party, you will lose your MP status. It is because you win the MP seat wearing your party colour. If you change your colour, you lose your seat.  This is the basic reason for the 2 by-elections after GE2011. 

Should we thank the PAP for amending the rules and regulations to have such a wonderful effect and killing the 5-million question?  It is not sure why the PAP wanted to do that when they were the monopoly in parliament.  Is this to make the party’s secretary-general or CEC more powerful?

In what way, can this ‘no jump ship’ law help the PAP continuing to be a dominant party? Perhaps, in the past it did help and prevent others for joining the oppositions or even (potentially) bankrupting a political party.  Just imagine if there is a political party having troubles with the Registry of Societies like the case of Democratic Action Party in Malaysia, all their elected members will lose their MP seats if the party is forced to dissolve (if this happen in Singapore).

If assuming the oppositions win the election in Malaysia by a small margin, a dissolved DAP will immediately make the BN come back to power again if they have the Singapore way. 

So, which is a better model? Singapore or Malaysia?  It has to come back the fundamental of political commitment again.       

People who stand for election must know what they are doing and what they are fighting for. They must know the political beliefs and ideology that they are campaigning and championing. No matter big parties, small parties or even independents, ask yourself why you want to stand for election and for what purpose?  

The PAP wants to be a dominant party, having majority in the parliament.  However, can they find enough committed individuals to carry out the political duties?     
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...
275 comments
Read more

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...
65 comments
Read more

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...
50 comments
Read more