Skip to main content

Lock-in Mobility and The Non-linear Model of Innovation in Singapore University Education

The new non-linear model will affect the mobility of  students due to the lock-in effect. This will make education planners think within the box rather than outside the box as they think the ‘jump-start’ approach has helped Singapore obtaining world standard in education and innovation.
In some ways, the new Singapore university education is adopting the ‘jump-start’ approach. The old and established universities are in the linear model of innovation.  But the newly set-up universities and institutions are very different.  There are all partner-institutions with foreign big names:

1.   Singapore University of Technology and Design is a project in collaboration with MIT. (http://www.sutd.edu.sg/)
2.   Lee Kong Chiang School of Medicine is a joint medical school between Imperial College London and NTU, Singapore. (http://www.lkcmedicine.ntu.edu.sg/Pages/index.aspx)
3.   Yale-NUS College (http://www.yale-nus.edu.sg/)

Based on the success and feedback of Singapore Management University and Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, the current ‘jump-start’ non-linear approach is an expansion of the model.  Will it create more lock-in effects that prevent out of box thinking and solution?        

Linear model of innovation

It is a straight line from basic research, applied research, development, and testing (technology) to commercialisation (application).
 source: cstpr.colorado.edu

Trajectories and lock-in effect
Technological development and advancement produce system, products and services easy to use.  This makes people revolve around a certain standard or habit (e.g. window operating system or touch screen technology). The lock-in effect will take place when people refuse to think of other solutions outside the standard.     

For example, the MRT system, transport planners think the train service is the best solution and refuse to allow parallel bus routes. This will affect the mobility of the commuters who have no alternative.

By adopting non-linear approach, these new institutions can ‘jump-start’ their innovation. They can avoid the routine path of Linear Model of Innovation and carry out applied research, development, testing and commercialisation at the same time and still retain the basic research.

This approach will give Singapore the latest technology and innovation in the world. Other advantages include shorter learning curve, quick obtainment of knowledge and more exchanges.  It can also move Singapore university education to world standard at the shortest possible time.

Why commercial partnership fails
This is different from commercial partnership between local companies and foreign universities that is mainly for profit purpose.   Except business education, like INSEAD, Chicago Business School, ESSEC, etc. other non-business education ventures are not doing well or had closed down, for example the failed UNSW Singapore, the troubled TischAsia (http://www.tischasia.nyu.edu.sg/page/home.html).    

There are critical success factors for this non-linear approach. Financially, the host country must be willing to invest. This is not suitable for developing or poor countries. Also, you must prepare to let foreign partners to lead the institutions.  As for students, they will have to pay higher tuition fees (comparing to older Singapore universities). Less qualify local students have to be replaced by talented foreign students with free scholarship.

Singapore seems to meet almost all the framework requirements for such a non-linear model. Be it education, competition, governance, finance, intellectual property rights, standards and public procurements.  Few countries in the world can meet all these conditions.

There are minimum operational problems as the design planning, concept and management of the whole setup are done by foreign experts with additional local inputs.  It looks like a perfect ‘jump-start’ innovation, just like the economic policies of Singapore.  The government will do whatever it can to meet the requirements of big foreign investors. It will create and import required software and hardware for heavy weight foreign investments.  

However, there are trade-offs politically and socially. Local students and their parents complain that they do not have opportunities to study locally and have to pay more to study overseas.  It is also difficult to (measure and) fairly distribute the wealth created by this innovation if there is any.

Perhaps, the most difficult issue is how to break the ‘lock-in’ mobility. Singapore, unlike Hong Kong, refuses to upgrade its polytechnics to full university. Polytechnics are another class of higher learning in Singapore. Singapore Institute of Technology is purposely setting up, partnering foreign universities, to offer degree courses to polytechnic graduates.

It will be more difficult for slower learners or even average students to benefit from the general modern ‘literacy’ of the non-linear model. 
  
How to ensure fair distribution of innovation
Singapore has obtained the latest technology and innovation from the world. We also invest heavily by providing good class education to local and foreign students.

How can we ensure there is a fair distribution of innovation products?   The jump-start model creates opportunities for talent students and enriches them with international mobility.     

This in fact touches on the basic problem of the population debate and also the question of chicken and eggs. If we do not provide the best environment, the talents do not want to come. However, with international mobility, the talents may not want to share innovation wealth with you as they can move to other countries easily.

In order to keep them and keep their innovation in Singapore, we have to offer them very high salaries.  

So, we are in a ‘lock-in’ situation. We are not able to think out of the box and we continue to debate within the Singapore standard or the PAP standard of economic policies and options.

It is a hard question that requires out-of-box thinking and ‘lock-out’ solutions.   But it is also not easy to find the right answer either as talents alone are not enough.   

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...