Skip to main content

Turning National Conversation to another Singapore GRC?


 
Don’t turn the National Conversation into another Singapore GRC. Otherwise, it will be an exercise to further dividing Singapore and disuniting the society.  

However, it seems it is going like the GRC-way. The GRC-way of debating Singapore’s future has turned bigger and bigger and like, the political GRC, from 5 or 6-man teams it now consists of the whole of Singapore. 

Through National Conversation, the discussions, the dialogues and the feedbacks will look like the whole country is involved and the so- called consensuses agreed upon are representing all Singaporeans.

As we all know to win a GRC, a team needs only 50.1% to take all the contested seats in the GRC.  There is no proportional representation in the GRC. So, in this case, the National Conversation needs only 50.1% of Singaporeans in agreeing with the consensuses. If it is true, then the National Conversation is just an instrument to mislead and misguide the country’s future.

The worst situation is it will move the country to a higher stage of division and disunity, from an already divided society after GE2011 and PE2011. 

Consistently, there is a “certain percentage” of the population is not participating in the national building in the past (we may use the percentage voted against the PAP in the past elections as a simple indication). Their ideas, preferred life style, alternative views are not incorporated into the planning of Singapore.

However, this coming National Conversation is different.

In the past, this “certain percentage” is mainly due to some particular reasons, e.g. Chinese language issue, lower income, less educated, anti-ISA and heavily influenced (but dislike) by the main stream media. 

The new “certain percentage” or new members to the “certain percentage” is different in a way that they are better educated, have better income, younger, knowledgeable and less likely to be influenced by MSM.  These new members even include PAP supporters who prefer the old PAP in the 1960s and 1970s and even agree with the existence of ISA or other high-handed policies. They even include new citizens who are not happy with the government. So, it is a very diverse, complicated, wide-ranging new “certain percentage”.  

It will be very difficult to get a national consensus under the GRC-type of National Conversation. Intentionally and unintentionally, this “certain percentage” will not be proportionally represented.  To show the face of consensus, some members in the “certain percentage” will be shown to the public, especially in the MSM. They are encouraged to join the conservation selectively and can voice their suggestions freely.   

But how to get the “die-hard”, new and old, to be represented in the National Conversation is a great challenge to Hang Swee Keat. 
                         
Perhaps, like all other past exercises of the PAP government, a national consensus is just a simple majority, a GRC-type of consensus.  Otherwise, a magician may be needed to carry out the job of a National ‘consensus’ Conversation.   
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...
275 comments
Read more

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...
65 comments
Read more

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...
50 comments
Read more