Skip to main content

Transparency and anti-corruption are equally important, if not more important.


If sex-for-favour is a new kind of corruption, then the lack of transparency can also lead to more corruptions.  Anti-corruption is the work of CPIB, however, transparency will expose everything to the public.

Transparency is a deterrent to corruption. An open, clear and transparent public administration will subject its officials not only to internal check and control, but in addition to the external and public check and control.

It is to the benefit of the government to be transparent, be it a tender exercise, a release of information or data, or even public policy and strategy. 

The tender of the folding bicycle; the selection of the National Conversation committee members; the population details; the release of re-restatement of our reserves; all seem falling below the first world standard of transparency.

PM Lee said the government will not tolerate corruption. However, he did not mention a word of transparency. He may think it is irrelevant as transparency and corruption are two different things. However, a high transparency level has helped to prevent corruption in many first world countries. Public officials know that they are responsible for the information or statistics released and they cannot release partial or incomplete information.

SINGAPORE - Despite high-profile graft allegations involving public officers recently, corruption involving the Government forms "only a small proportion" of all cases here and is not a worsening trend, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said yesterday. 
The Government will nevertheless throw the book at anyone involved in corruption and wrongdoing, even if this comes at the expense of its reputation, Mr Lee warned. 
"Let me be quite clear - we will never tolerate corruption; we will not accept any slackening or lowering of standards," he said in a speech at the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau's (CPIB) 60th anniversary celebration. "Anyone who breaks the rules will be caught and punished. No cover-up will be allowed, no matter how senior the officer or how embarrassing it may be."
He added: "It's far better to suffer the embarrassment and to keep the system clean for the long-term than to pretend that nothing has gone wrong and to let the rot spread." (Today 19 Sept 2012)


Transparency will not affect the reputation of Singapore and it will not embarrass the government too as everyone knows a responsible government is a transparent government. 

CPIB has helped to prevent corruption in Singapore and makes Singapore one of the leading least corrupted countries in the world. But we certainly need to catch up on the transparency level – we are yet to become the world leading transparent country.   

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...
275 comments
Read more

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...
65 comments
Read more

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...
50 comments
Read more