Skip to main content

Singapore no more the Chinese Centre of Southeast Asia


With the establishment of Asean Chinese news centre in Malaysia by Xinhua news agency (http://www.newchinesenet.com/), Singapore is fast losing the status of Chinese centre of Southeast Asia to our neighbour.

In fact, our Chinese education has gone back to pre-school level as announced by PM Lee during NDR 2012. He had expressed his support of the setting up of Chinese Institute by the Hokkien Huay Kuan.

What does it mean?

We are going back to pre-school education, teaching and encouraging our young to learn Chinese in a “private initiative”. We do not have enough Singaporean Chinese to have the mastery of the language to attract Xinhua to co-operate with us to set up their regional centre in Southeast Asia.

We hope to use the “private initiative” like the past, before our independence, to get back the Chinese regional centre status.  Now with the strong government support, will this initiative materialise?   

We can’t even do it in primary and secondary schools, in what way we are so confident to do it in the pre-school level?

The loss of the Chinese centre of Southeast Asia is a painful experience. To gain back the status, it will also be a painful route. Are we ready to take it?

While in Malaysia, they have sufficient “Chinese knowledge” manpower to co-operate with Xinhua. With the approval university status of Southern College by Malaysian government recently, Malaysia now has the complete Chinese education from primary to university level.

They must have the critical mass to attract Xinhua’s partnership.   
Despite our strong relationship with China, our good location, our international reputation, we are not able to attract this co-operation. Are there any long-term consequence?  Have we seen our weaknesses?

Does it mean Zaobao or SPH is not good enough for Xinhua? Even Xinhua wants to co-operate with us, does Zaobao have enough talents to carry out the task, besides importing foreign talents?  An Asean news centre should have Asean inputs and this requires local manpower support.  Apparently, we do not have this capability even though we are financially strong.

So, money is not everything, you must have contents; you must have substance.  
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...
275 comments
Read more

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...
65 comments
Read more

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...
50 comments
Read more