Skip to main content

Remember June 4. Remember ISA. Any lessons learned?



Wang Dan (王丹), one of the June 4 Incident (or June 4 Tian An Men Protest/Masscare) student leaders, has just established an institute on Oct 1, the national day of the People’s Republic of China

He named the Institute as New School for Democracy or Chinese Democratic Institution (华人民主书院 www.ns4d.org) and the institute is registered in Hong Kong but is based in Taiwan.  In a celebration to mark the formation of the institute, no representatives of Chinese Nationalist Party (国民党) as well the Chinese Communists Party (中国共产党) were present. The absence of CCP is obvious and understandable but why the absence of Nationalists (whose party leader is the current President of Taiwan and the host country of the institute)? Perhaps, it is because the institute is supported by Democratic Progress Party and the exiled Tibet leaders.    
Since 1989, many overseas Chinese as well those in exiles from China have held memorial parades and anniversary to denounce the CCP.  However, the economic success of China has also created a controversy whether to continue attacking and criticising the way June 4 Incident was handled in 1989.

This is especially in the West when the West seems not able to handle their economic problems. So,
they don’t criticise China as much as before. The economic problems facing USA, Europe and Japan have down played the importance and significance of June 4.  But can we just let go and don’t remember June 4 anymore? What lessons have we learned from June 4?  Is Political stability the number one important issue for a country’s development?

June 4 and ISA

Besides Singapore and Malaysia, few overseas Chinese know about the ISA arrests in Singapore and Malaysia.  They cannot understand the ISA and its purposes. Some may even wonder whether ISA exists in these 2 countries.     

Comparing to June 4, our ISA incident is a smaller scale operation and incident.  However, these ISA arrests in the past are also important parts of our history.  Can we just forget about the ISA arrests and detentions?   What have we learned from the arrests and detentions without trial?

Yes, you may argue that because of the ISA arrests, Singapore has become more stable and we progress and achieve economic success.  Without the ISA, we may not achieve the status of first world country.  So, the ISA arrests are a price to pay for the country’s progress. And the government has every reason to justify the arrests.

Are June 4 and ISA arrests the victims and sacrifices of economic progress and development?  In any part of the history, in human development, in country advancement, there are some ones who will have to be scarified.  So, those victims of June 4 and ISA are the unlucky lots.  

I am in no position to say which is right and which is wrong? But we really need to learn from the mistakes. Likes the CCP, the PAP will say there is no mistake.  Howeverit is not an issue that the government can close the case by saying there is no necessity to have a commission of enquiry to investigate and justify the arrests.  The ISA issue will never close in such a way, just like the June 4 Incident.  It will still be remembered.

Remember June 4 and remember the ISA arrests are painful and pitiful.  Future historians may make a better judgment if humanity is being considered.   

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting

因为有比较, 才知道做得不够, 才明白什么叫做易通。

  因为有比较, 才知道做得不够, 才明白什么叫做易通。 如果只有一套解决方法,很难看出好坏,方便还是不方便,易通还是不容易通。用新方法代替旧的系统,人们当然会做比较,尤其是科技产品,使用的人很多,一用就马上看到结果。 这是一个竞争的世界,即使一党独大,也要考虑到便民。当人民觉得不方便,不好用,不易通,就会反映,发声,不满。为什么没有预先想到,最可怕的是测试时,已经接到反应,还是不加改善。或许,行动党还抱着“令伯”最大,用者自行解决问题。 易通公交收费系统的整合,似乎缺少一种人文,沟通,反而更加多表现出政府的独断独行。尤其重要的是,如果只有一套系统,我们是看不出问题,做不出好坏的评价。 这其实证明国会里不可以只有一把声音,没有比较,没有进步。

梁文辉可能有点傻, 但却是真的真情流露。