Skip to main content

五十步笑一百步,愚民政策下的愚民连续剧


在部长批评本地连续剧水准差,喧闹一场,没有水准的时候,行动党政府是否应该先检讨一下自己,谁是造成这种感慨剧目,难堪场景的作始俑者。新加坡的媒体广播,在行动党一党独大的管理下,如果有什么不对的地方,当然不可以怪其他的人,只能怪自己教导无方,用人不当。

什么样的瓜,就结什么样的果,难道,用鸡蛋就会孵出凤凰来吗?本地连续剧独霸黄金时段,推出的连续剧在没有竞争的情形下,如何取得进步。再加上,连续剧的内容又要配合政府的政策演出,编剧演员的功力又跟不上,种种的限制,重重的困难,还要加上预算的控制,如何演的好看,编出精彩。


因此,部长实在不用生气,不用埋怨什么人,回头望一望,我国连续剧失败的真正原因。本地连续剧的演员,编剧,如果不出产这样的连续剧,那才是怪事。这些演员就只能依靠大声说话,粗言粗语,来应对,来敷衍,反正,是做一日和尚,拿一天薪水,就敲它一日钟。

说到这里,我倒有点同情起这些编剧演员来了。我国连续剧的主流其实是华语连续剧,这些第八波道播出的连续剧,是行动党的拉票工具,它们虽然没有什么特别的精彩演出,但是说到影响力,就会影响一般的市民,影响他们的投票倾向。细算起来,他们的功劳其实不小,行动党的铁票,陈庆炎的36%,好多都是这些连续剧的观从。

做出贡献,却要挨骂是何道理?不要忘记,我国的主流媒体语言,官方常用语,依然是英语英文。你就是做的再好,也不过是个配角。向上邀功没有你的份,向下挨骂就有你的份。难怪,在演出时,要大声的宣泄,还要装不会说标准的华语,加插几句英语,怪模怪样的配合政策的剧情演出。

试问,这样的连续剧,又如何有所突破,又如何有所创新,政府在批评连续剧时,是否是应该先检讨一下,自己要的是什么样的连续剧?

自己既然已经为连续剧定了位,又为何要埋怨连续剧不到位呢?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...